My Two Cents: The ABA Takes Lawyers’ Use of AI Head-On!
/I can’t visit Chicago without stopping by one of my favorite apple stores!
Last week, I attended the ABA 2024 Annual Meeting in Chicago, focusing on the Artificial Intelligence (AI) sessions. This conference followed the release of the ABA’s Formal Opinion 512 on Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools. Over the past few years, the ABA has issued several opinions indirectly addressing AI:
ABA Formal Opinion 511 (May 8, 2024): Addressing confidentiality obligations when lawyers post to listservs, with implications for the use of large language models (LLMs) and generative AI.
ABA Formal Opinion 498 (March 10, 2021): Discussing the ethical implications of remote work, including the use of technology such as AI.
ABA Formal Opinion 482 (September 19, 2018): Addressing ethical obligations related to disasters, including the use of technology to continue providing legal services.
ABA Formal Opinion 477R (May 11, 2017, revised May 22, 2017): Providing guidance on securing communication of protected client information, including the use of technology such as AI.
Opinion 512 emphasizes that lawyers must balance the benefits of AI tools with their ethical obligations to ensure competent, confidential, and transparent client representation. I plan to delve deeper into Opinion 512 next week. The key takeaway is that as AI technology evolves, ongoing education and vigilance are crucial to maintaining high professional standards in the legal field. This is why I attended the ABA 2024 Conference!
Session Highlights
Jayne R. Reardon, discussing the ethical and professional responsibility issues lawyers must be aware of when using AI for their work!
The first session I attended was "CLE in the City: AI Hot Topics Every Lawyer Needs to Know," hosted by Taft Law and moderated by Lucy L. Thompson, Principal at Livingston PLLC. The panel included:
Leighton Allen, Associate at Foley & Lardner, LLP.
Jayne R. Reardon, Ethics and Professional Responsibility Counsel
Magistrate Judge Gabriel A. Fuentes, U.S. Magistrate Judge, Northern District of Illinois
Josh Strickland, Corporate Vice President, Global Products, Motorola Solutions
Honorable E. Kenneth Wright, Jr., Presiding Judge, 1st Municipal District, Circuit Court of Cook County
Professor Daniel W. Linna, Jr., Director of Law and Technology Initiatives, Northwestern Pritzker School of Law, and McCormick School of Engineering
Jayne Reardon discussed the ethical considerations lawyers must address when using AI, covering issues from hallucinations to confidentiality. Judge Fuentes shared his journey from having a no-AI policy to realizing its impracticality, acknowledging that AI is already embedded in tools like spell check, grammar check, and legal research. Ultimately, the responsibility lies with the lawyer to verify their work before submission.
Access to Justice
Another significant topic was access to justice. Judge Wright emphasized the importance of helping economically disadvantaged individuals with their legal matters. When I asked the panel if they knew of any AI tools that were reliable, maintained client PII, and were free to the public, none could provide an example. The general consensus was that this is a significant hurdle in meeting access to justice needs.
AI in Legal Education
Legal experts debate AI ethics at the ABA 2024 Conference
Improving AI is being addressed through both education and development. Professor Linna mentioned that his school is teaching AI to law students, with law students and computer engineers collaborating on AI projects. This is promising, but it raises questions about how well other law schools are addressing this matter. Some schools are only beginning to teach basic automation functions in Microsoft Word, which has been around for decades. 🙄 This disparity highlights the challenge law schools face in keeping up with the rapidly changing technology landscape.
ABA Experts Session: Technology Issues
In this intimate gathering moderated by Anna Mercado Clark, Esq., CIPP/E, CIPP/US, CIPM, FIP, partner at Phillips Lytle LLP and co-leader of its Technology Industry Team, participants engaged in a candid discussion about the concerns surrounding technology in today's legal practice. A primary concern among attendees, including myself, was the impact of AI on the legal profession. Questions arose such as: Will AI replace the need for lawyers? How can lawyers stay updated on AI capabilities and limitations? Do lawyers need to incorporate AI into their practice? What are the courts' stances on AI usage, and to what extent is it permitted?
The discussion built on points from the earlier session but offered unique insights from participants like Justice Robert J. Torres Jr., Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Guam, and Manuel A. Quilichini García, President of the Puerto Rico Bar Association. They highlighted how AI is affecting lawyers, judges, and court systems, stressing the importance of practical, real-life experiences in integrating AI into legal practice. These real-world insights are crucial for lawyers to navigate the future competently and ethically.
This session on the ethics of generative AI, Moderated by Justice Torres, delved into the ethical implications and challenges posed by AI in the legal field. The panel included:
Hon. Samuel A. Thumma, Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One, who serves on the ABA's Judicial Division and Appellate Judges Conference Ethics & Professional Committees;
Hon. Kimberly Kim, Assistant Chief Administrative Judge of the California Public Utilities Commission, who serves on the Technology Committee of the AB's Judicial Division;
Hon. Jennifer A. Mabey, Utah District Court Judge;
Hon. Stephanie Domitrovich, PhD, Sr. Trial Court Judge of Pennsylvania state courts; and
Zach Warren from Thomson-Reuters
Lead by Justice Torres, A Panel discusses ethical challenges of AI for lawyers and judges.
This session delved into the ethical implications and challenges posed by AI in the legal field. The panel underscored the necessity for legal professionals to understand the capabilities and limitations of AI technologies to ensure they are used responsibly and ethically. Zach Warren started by providing the audience with a framework that defined key terms. The discussions then focused on maintaining client confidentiality, the accuracy of AI-generated information, and the potential biases embedded in AI systems. Several examples with multiple-choice answers highlighted real-life scenarios, evoking memories of the multi-state portion of the bar exam for some audience members. The program emphasized the importance of continuous education and ethical vigilance as lawyers integrate AI into their practices, ensuring that these technologies enhance rather than undermine the justice system.
Final Thoughts
The ABA 2024 Annual Conference underscored the critical role of AI in modern legal practice and the ethical considerations that come with it. AI is already a part of legal practice, from spell check and grammar check to legal research tools like LexisNexis, Westlaw, and Fastcase. Staying informed and adapting to these changes is essential for maintaining high professional standards and ensuring access to justice for all. If you and your firm are not keeping up with the acceleration of AI, you risk losing clients to more efficient firms, revenue, and scrutiny from your bar association regarding compliance with ethical standards.
Lawyers who do not keep up with the evolving AI landscape will be left behind by those who do!
🚨
Lawyers who do not keep up with the evolving AI landscape will be left behind by those who do! 🚨
MTC