Hardware Thursdays with an Editorial Bent - Why I Chose Two Samsung 27 Viewfinity S9 Series Monitors Over the Apple Vision Pro (and also the Apple Studio Display).

/ The Tech-Savvy Lawyer.Page/

Lawyers deliberating between a new monitor or an apple vision pro…

Here is the conundrum, do I, The Tech-Savvy Lawyer with a clear bent on Apple Products, shell out between $2,500 - $3,500 for Apple Vision Pro, $199 for Waterfield Shield Case for Apple Vision Pro with Strap, $499 for two years or $24.99/month (plus potential service fees) for AppleCare or do I spend $1,798 (at $899 each - normally $1,599 each) on two Samsung 27 Viewfinity S9 Series Monitors (and I've seen cheaper recently). I have two aging LG 4K monitors that, as my wife will ensure you, I have been complaining commenting that they may be fading. After some research, debate, and a surprise bonus a client from my day job gave me (thanks, client!), I went with the monitors. And here's why:

The Apple Vision Pro is truly an amazing device and is sure to get better over time - see my prior posting. It is a remarkable media consumption device. It has two 4K screens and runs on an M2 chip with 16GB of unified memory. You get to watch and view movies in a cool environment, in many in 2-D, some in 3-D, and some (including your own created videos shot) in spatial video mode. Photos are amazing whether in 2-D, 3-D, or even in Panoramic mode. But the productivity applications seem to be lacking.

Samsung offers some great monitors.

When the iPad first came out, it was praised to be a laptop killer! It was (and still is) a great media consumption device. The productivity angle was apparent but not there yet. And in the fourteen (14)-plus years since its release, it has not caught up to expectations, i.e., the productivity scale of a laptop. Remember, I could not afford the first iPad; it was a surprise gift from my grandmother. And it has been a great media consumption device (with some minimal productivity value when I'm in a pinch). I recognize some of my thinking may conflict with my purchase of the Apple Watch when it was first released. But the personal and professional utility were both evident the first time I tried it on.

So, I opted for two 5K monitors to replace my aging 4K LGs. Here's why. I already have a more powerful computer with my Mac Studio with M1 Ultra Chip 96GB RAM and 2TB hard drive. I don't need 3D to do my work (although there may be a legitimate use for lawyers using the AVP to create renderings of crime scenes, traffic accidents, or other locales or rendering in 3D for a jury trial). But the software (and even possibly the hardware) is not there yet. Analysts suggest that the next version of the AVP will not likely be released till 2017. By then, we'll see some of the bugs (common with any first-generation product) removed and have an idea of how software companies (used by lawyers) are adapting to, if at all, this great product. IMHO, the novelty of it all simply does not justify purchasing it for work, and it is still in the early stages of appreciating its media consumption function, i.e., enough media to utilize its unique abilities on a mass market basis. But why, then, did I get a Samsung monitor versus an Apple Studio Display - Apple's 5k monitor?

The two monitors, Samsung v. Apple, both have nice screens - they are 5K monitors, after all - although some reviews argue that the ASD beats out the Samsung screen-wise by a smidge. So, let's compare the rest. The ASD is a more solid device both in the construction of the monitor and its stand: Hands down, when comparing the construction of the chassis and stand for each monitor, the ASD wins - the monitor is much more solid (not feeling cheaply made), the stand works like butter thus easy to use, and its software OS naturally works with the Mac OS. The Samsung's frame is a little less desirable; the stand requires you to fight with it a little to get it where you want it (although you can turn it 90°s on the SM-included stand  - something you cannot do with ASD – unless you get a monitor arm from a third-party retailer), and does not natively work with Mac OS (indeed, you have to use a remote control or the knob on the back of the device to adjust screen setting and internal sound). Note that the Samsung monitor has a Thunderbolt 4 port versus ADS's Thunderbolt 3). Samsung beats out ASD with a Thunderbolt 4 port, three USB-C (2.0) ports, and a mini DisplayPort input). The speaker and attached webcam do not compete with the ASD. (Connectivity-wise, they both have three USB-C (2.0) ports.  So again, why did I go with Samsung?

Is the Apple Vision Pro sufficiently useful for professionals to warrant its acquisition for professional use?

The Samsung monitor was retailing at $1,599 with only a matte-display option. The ASD starts at $1599 (for standard glass) or $1899 (for Nano-texture glass that scatters light to further minimize glare) with a tilt-adjustable stand -- add $400 for Apple’s tilt- and height-adjustable stand. There can be a $700 hundred-dollar difference with SM. I had read a review that basically said if the Samsung monitor were about $900, then it would be a good deal. At the time of my purchase, Amazon had the Samsung Monitors at $899. I got the screen quality I wanted at half the price. (Note: I do not need the speakers [I have a 20-year-old set of Bose computer speakers that work great], and I do not need the built-in webcam [which, by the way, is detachable]) So, I got two great monitors at half the cost of two ASD or one AVP. I thought that was the more prudent way to go.

Maybe when I have a really big win in a case or bring in significant cash through the blog and podcast, I'll consider getting an AVP. Of course, I am never shy of a relative getting me one! 😉🙃🤗😀🤪

My Two Cents:  Initial Impressions: My Hands-On Experience with Apple's Vision Pro!

/ The Tech-Savvy Lawyer.Page/

I decided I had to try on an Apple Vision Pro to see what all the hype was for myself. And I walked away with mixed results.

I had set up an appointment with my local Apple Store (did you know that my "local" Apple Store is at the mall where the first Apple Store opened? It has moved locations within the mall only fairly recently). When I arrived, I was greeted by the friendly staff I always expect from Apple. They directed me to their Vision Pro area.

I was welcomed and first asked if I had an eyeglass prescription. I did, and they needed to check my prescription to determine the ZEISS Optical Inserts I needed. They did this with a machine similar to what you see in your optometrist's office that makes an initial quick diagnosis of my prescription. (Note: It is my understanding that you will need to bring in a recent written prescription from a doctor in order to get your Optical Inserts when you purchase the Vision Pro).

While they were getting the Vision Pro and Optical Inserts, the employees brought me to a table and had me sit down. After a couple of minutes, they brought out the Vision Pro in a Vision Pro box -- this box is similar to any Apple product. (Note that Apple's carrying case costs nearly $200.00!) Opening the box had the same awe you get when unboxing any Apple product for the first time.

The device was securely placed in the box. I was instructed on how to lift the device properly (thumb under the nose with your other hand lifting the back of the Solo Knit Band). It was lighter than I expected (between 21.2–22.9 ounces. Weight varies depending on the Light Seal and head band configuration). This weight does not consider the weight of the Optical Inserts, but they added minimal difference! I can see how over time, where I'd want to wear the Dual Loop Band versus the Solo Knit Band for better support– although both are included.

After being given a tutorial on the buttons, straps, etc., I tried it on. The Vision Pro did not feel heavy or awkward. But I was disappointed that the light seal was not blocking out all of the light – there was a sliver of light under the light seal and my left and right nostrils. I was very surprised to learn that this has been an ongoing problem with these demonstrations. (Although later, I found that it did not interfere with my enjoyment of the Vision Pro. But, I was still initially a little disappointed.) Then the coup de grâce of my wait was over – I turned it on …

I heard a familiar Apple chime as it booted up. The quality of the device's sound was (and will continue to be) truly amazing. I saw the Macintosh icon in black and white. Then, I was introduced to the spatial operating system – it was neat!

To start, we had to personalize the device for me. It was a little awkward at first. No one realized that I could not pinch to manipulate with my thumb and middle finger. You have to use (at least when I visited the store last Monday) your thumb and index finger. Once we got that squared away (and for all of us, i.e., Apple employees and myself, taking the unit on and off, rebooting, inter alia), setting up the device was a breeze.

Once you are set up, you really feel immersed in a 3-D Mac OS reality. The two 4k custom micro‑OLED display systems make you think the program icons were just hanging there. Photos popped in regular, landscape, and even in 3-D (if your camera supports such a feature). Likewise, so did your movies and TV shows! The immersion videos (although limited at this time) truly made you feel, in one simulation, as if you were on the tightrope with the adventurer over the valley! You can also place your OS in various 3-D environments of many beautiful earth-bound environments and even the moon! 🌝 This will indeed have the makings of a fun device as they continue to improve the operating system and device itself...

But notice what I did not discuss. After the end of the presentation, the Apple employees asked me if I was ready to buy. I answered no. I told them (aside from that my wife may kill me for spending $3,500 plus) that the device was lacking work productivity applicability. After the presentation, I had to ask how to use a keyboard with it. They then showed me the virtual keyboard (which I did not grasp while I was there for 20–30 minutes that I had with it). I was advised that the virtual keyboard function was just not quite ready - so it was not part of their clearly structured presentation (my guide was reading from a script on his iPad mini). And they also advised me that I could use a Bluetooth keyboard with programs like Notes (and MS Word?), etc.

According to Mark German of Bloomberg, the Vision Pro may take four versions before it "reaches its ideal form — similar to the progression of the iPhone, iPad and Apple Watch." I think the Apple Vision Pro is and will be a great media consumption device - I can definitely see it as a great utility when I'm flying cramped in coach on my next flight (however, Jeff Richardson over iPhone J.D. reminds us we still need room to operate the device [and some other great tips for air travel with your new Vision Pro) and other scenarios. But just like the iPad was supposed to be the laptop killer (it's not), neither is the Vision Pro.

Maybe one day I'll get one, but not right now. Based on my experience, it seems even Apple needs to get itself up-to-speed on what the Vision Pro can and cannot do. It is rumored that Apple is preparing for a 2.0 update to the Vision Pro's OS, along with updates to other devices. These releases may reveal Apple's plans for integrating the Vision Pro into its other hardware. But right now, if I am going to spend $3,500 plus, I'll be getting a new computer (and right now, my M1 Ultra Studio is working just fine!).

MTC

My Two Cents: The First Apple Macintosh Computer Turns 40! 🥳 A Reminder For Lawyers On The Technological Shift In Legal Practice.

/ The Tech-Savvy Lawyer.Page/

The first mac was release on Jan 24, 1984.

The introduction of the Macintosh computer in 1984 marked a significant turning point in the legal profession, revolutionizing how lawyers practiced law. As we commemorate 40 years since its inception, lawyers should reflect on how this technological shift transformed their work and understand its lasting impact on legal practice.

Before the advent of personal computers, legal professionals primarily relied on typewriters, handwritten documents, and physical libraries for research. This laborious process often consumed significant time and resources. However, with the introduction of Macintosh and its Graphical User Interface (GUI), lawyers were empowered with tools that, over time, would streamline their workflow and enhance efficiency. The GUI provided lawyers with a user-friendly experience through icons, windows, and menus instead of complex command lines.

today’s lawyers have much to celebrate today given apple’s gui Operating system!

I am sure there are some early Windows users screaming that "everyone" was using Windows well before Macintosh computers. And they are half right. No one could have been using Windows OS before Mac OS because Mac OS came out nearly two years before Microsoft's GUI-based Windows. So, Mac wins, right? Kind of.

Although Mac's GUI was released before Windows OS, Windows was more widely used than Macs. The public's perception was that Macs were geared toward a more creative audience. In contrast, Windows computers were geared toward those in the business world, especially since Windows machines were networked before Macs were. Plus, Mac's first GUI word processing program, MacWrite, had some serious limitations when first introduced.

The first Mac cost about $2,495 ($7,500 in today's dollars) - the first Mac had a built-in screen and mouse and 128kb of memory - think about it, 1,000,000 kb equals 1 GB!

So, let's be clear: the initial release of the Macintosh Computer was not the immediate answer for how lawyers work today. Instead, its GUI-based operating system initiated the journey toward modern computing, incorporating word processing, file and case management, and web-based research. This evolution continues to shape lawyers' digital landscape today.

Happy Birthday, Macintosh!

My Two Cents: The Future Of Lawyering: Exploring The Impact Of Apple's Vision Pro On Legal Professionals!

/ The Tech-Savvy Lawyer.Page/

Has Apple's new Vision Pro created a breakthrough in augmented reality for the legal profession in the business world?

As legal professionals strive to enhance efficiency, improve client service, and streamline workflows, we increasingly turn to innovative technological solutions. One such solution that has generated significant interest within the legal community is Apple's Vision Pro.

Apple's Vision Pro is an augmented reality (AR) device developed by the tech giant, specifically focusing on aiding professionals in various fields. This cutting-edge device combines advanced optics, powerful processing capabilities, and seamless integration with Apple's ecosystem to deliver an immersive AR experience. While initially targeted at creative industries such as design and architecture, legal professionals are now exploring its potential applications within their own domain.

Apple’s new vision Pro
© Apple

I can see how this kind of technology holds the potential to revolutionize courtroom presentations, transitioning from static displays to engaging, interactive 3D visualizations. Attorneys could employ this AR prowess to project dynamic reconstructions of crime scenes or accidents, offering juries and judges an unparalleled perspective into complex evidence. Beyond the courtroom, the Vision Pro can help and possibly improve the day-to-day work (especially for people with certain health conditions or impairments[1]). 

For example, Vision Pro's potential to redefine legal research and document review is significant. It should enable attorneys to overlay case law, statutes, or annotations onto physical documents, thereby integrating digital information into the tangible world and expediting the research process. Augmented related can help improve collaboration amongst staff or when conducting depositions – giving parties the “feeling” they are all in the same room despite being miles away from each other. 

Will apple’s vision pro take lawyers in a new direction for their trial work?

Apple’s Vision Pro should provide lawyers with file management similar to any other technological device.  It should give an attorney the ability to access ?all? of the web-based tools they need – research, law practice management platform, file storage, etc. (I put the "all" in question marks as we will have to see if the devices OS has any compatibility issues.) Apple’s Vision Pro OS provides similar security as it does for its other products.  So, maintaining privilege and confidentiality should not be an issue for lawyers. Does that mean you should run out to buy one? 🧐

The Vision Pro starts at $3,499.  And it only provides 256 GB hard drive.  The battery lasts two hours.  And it is brand new.  While Apple is known for making great products, sometimes it’s not always best to be first in line to buy a new Apple product -- just like Apple is known for not being the first to create a new type of product -- just a good product after it has had some time to review the competition.

I remember how excited I was to get my first ipad - but it was no laptop killer!🙄

I remember when the iPad came first out.  It was nice, but at the time, I could not afford one.  At the time, my mother was astonished I did not have one (as I explained, I had to prioritize my spending) and was gifted one soon after (thanks, Grandma Harriet!).  Are you ready to go out and buy more than a baker’s dozen for a jury, the judge, and court staff?

The iPad is a great device, but it never became the laptop killer some were hoping it would be.  Given the cost and newness of the device, I’ll wait for a few versions before I go out and get one.

(Unfortunately, Grandma Harriet is no longer with us. 🙁 But if anyone wants to buy me one, I won’t complain! 🥳)

[1] Editor’s note: This aspect of Vision Pro (and other augmented reality devices) is beyond this editorial's scope.

#75: Benefits of Apple Products in Law Practice: Interview with Dave Hamilton

/ The Tech-Savvy Lawyer.Page/

In this podcast episode, renowned tech expert Dave Hamilton dives into the world of Mac-centric productivity, uncovering the unique advantages Macs offer over Windows machines. Dave is a seasoned podcaster, publisher, and self-professed nerd with a rich background in educating numerous computer users over thirty years. We cover the longevity, cost-effectiveness, and quality of life benefits of Macs, their top productivity features like seamless device integration, Dave's travel tech tips including a 4K OLED screen and charging essentials, Mac-specific productivity tools focusing on scripting and audio editing, and much more!

Join Dave and me as we discuss the following three questions and more!

Join me with my guest mac geek gab podcast host dave hamilton as we discuss the benefits of using a mac at work!

  1. After over 900 episodes on MGG, what are the three most common questions about tech you still get today?

  2. Apple computers still have somewhat of an aura of being made for creative people and not professionals; what are your top three reasons any professionals, including us lawyers, would want to switch from PC to Mac?

  3. What are your top three favorite productivity functions you can do only on a Mac?

In our conversation, we cover the following:

[01:15] Dave's Personal Tech Setup and Upgrade Considerations

[15:56] Navigating Mac Upgrades, Backup Strategies, and Choosing the Right Wi-Fi System

[38:59] PC to Mac Transition: Insights on Integration, Compatibility, and Battery Life for Professionals

[54:48] Investing in a Mac: Exploring Longevity, Total Cost of Ownership, and Support Benefits Over Windows

Mac Geek Gab: A friendly forum to learna bout all things apple!

[59:14] Mac Productivity Unleashed: Leveraging Automation, Scripting, and Audio Routing for Peak Performance

[01:21:58] Behind the Podcast Curtain: Tools and Tricks for Pro-Level Recording and Editing

Resources:

Connect with Dave:

Bluesky: bsky.app/profile/davehamilton.com

Facebook: facebook.com/hamilton.dave

Instagram: instagram.com/davehamilton/

LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/davehamilton/

Mastodon: podcastindex.social/@DaveHamilton

Twitter:twitter.com/DaveHamilton

Website: macgeekgab.com/

Hardware mentioned in the conversation:

DALL*E depicting dave and i recording our podcast - it got my beard but would not make me bald?

Software, Apps & Cloud Services mentioned in the conversation:

Shout Out: Previous Podcast Guest Brett Burney talks about his evolution of computer use on MPU!

/ The Tech-Savvy Lawyer.Page/

I am always catching up on my podcasts. There are many out there - some great, some not so good. It can be challenging to listen to all of them, and you do get behind in your listening (much like we get behind in our book reading list).  I had a chance to catch up on an old recording of the Mac Power Users, Episode #597, with previous The Tech-Savvy Lawyer.Page Podcast guest Brett Burney.

My first computer if you don’t count my pong game from the mid- to late-1970s or my atari in the early 1980S!

Although it’s a couple of years old (yes, I sometimes skip episodes [in this case unintentionally]), I had a chance to listen to it and found it both valuable and entertaining. Brett, Dave, and Stephen, discuss many things about Mac.  But they also discuss how Brett uses his vast knowledge of computers to assist law firms in using technology effectively and efficiently in their practice.  I enjoyed hearing about Brett's journey starting office with a TRS-80 (me too!) to his first Mac to his iPhone, iPad, and Mac selection of choice today!

I think any lawyer, whether they use Windows or Apple, will enjoy the interview as Brett talks about his evolution of computer user in his personal and professional life. I think we can all learn something from this interview.  I know I did!

Enjoy!