MTC (Bonus): National Court Technology Rules: Finding Balance Between Guidance and Flexibility ⚖️

Standardizing Tech Guidelines in the Legal System

Lawyers and their staff needs to know the standard and local rules of AI USe in the courtroom - their license could depend on it.

The legal profession stands at a critical juncture where technological capability has far outpaced judicial guidance. Nicole Black's recent commentary on the fragmented approach to technology regulation in our courts identifies a genuine problem—one that demands serious consideration from both proponents of modernization and cautious skeptics alike.

The core tension is understandable. Courts face legitimate concerns about technology misuse. The LinkedIn juror research incident in Judge Orrick's courtroom illustrates real risks: a consultant unknowingly violated a standing order, resulting in a $10,000 sanction despite the attorney's good-faith disclosure and remedial efforts. These aren't theoretical concerns—they reflect actual ethical boundaries that protect litigants and preserve judicial integrity. Yet the response to these concerns has created its own problems.

The current patchwork system places practicing attorneys in an impossible position. A lawyer handling cases across multiple federal districts cannot reasonably track the varying restrictions on artificial intelligence disclosure, social media evidence protocols, and digital research methodologies. When the safe harbor is simply avoiding technology altogether, the profession loses genuine opportunities to enhance accuracy and efficiency. Generative AI's citation hallucinations justify judicial scrutiny, but the ad hoc response by individual judges—ranging from simple guidance to outright bans—creates unpredictability that chills responsible innovation.

SHould there be an international standard for ai use in the courtroom

There are legitimate reasons to resist uniform national rules. Local courts understand their communities and case management needs better than distant regulatory bodies. A one-size-fits-all approach might impose burdensome requirements on rural jurisdictions with fewer tech-savvy practitioners. Furthermore, rapid technological evolution could render national rules obsolete within months, whereas individual judges retain flexibility to respond quickly to emerging problems.

Conversely, the current decentralized approach creates serious friction. The 2006 amendments to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for electronically stored information succeeded partly because they established predictability across jurisdictions. Lawyers knew what preservation obligations applied regardless of venue. That uniformity enabled the profession to invest in training, software, and processes. Today's lawyers lack that certainty. Practitioners must maintain contact lists tracking individual judge orders, and smaller firms simply cannot sustain this administrative burden.

The answer likely lies between extremes. Rather than comprehensive national legislation, the profession would benefit from model standards developed collaboratively by the Federal Judicial Conference, state supreme courts, and bar associations. These guidelines could allow reasonable judicial discretion while establishing baseline expectations—defining when AI disclosure is mandatory, clarifying which social media research constitutes impermissible contact, and specifying preservation protocols that protect evidence without paralyzing litigation.

Such an approach acknowledges both legitimate judicial concerns and legitimate professional needs. It recognizes that judges require authority to protect courtroom procedures while recognizing that lawyers require predictability to serve clients effectively.

I basically agree with Nicole: The question is not whether courts should govern technology use. They must. The question is whether they govern wisely—with sufficient uniformity to enable compliance, sufficient flexibility to address local concerns, and sufficient clarity to encourage rather than discourage responsible innovation.

TSL Labs Bonus Podcast: Google’s Notebook LLM “Deep Dive” on December 1st, 2025, editorial on the the Lawyer’s Defense Against Holiday Scams and ‘Bargain’ Tech Traps!

Listen in as Google's Notebook LLM provides an AI-powered conversation unpacks our December 1st, 2025 editorial examining how the holiday digital marketplace transforms into a lucrative hunting ground for device compromise and credential theft. We explore why attorneys and paralegals—trained to spot hidden clauses and anticipate risk—often abandon professional skepticism when faced with shiny gadgets bearing 70% off stickers. Our discussion arms you with actionable strategies to protect your practice, safeguard client confidentiality, and prevent the kind of security breaches that trigger bar complaints and operational shutdowns. Whether you're a solo practitioner or part of a large firm, this episode delivers the technical insights you need without the jargon.

Join Google's Notebook LLM as we discuss the following three questions and more!

  1. How do bargain tech deals create hidden professional liabilities that extend far beyond wasted money, and what specific technical deficits should lawyers avoid in discount hardware?

  2. What free forensic tools can legal professionals use to distinguish genuine discounts from manipulated pricing schemes, and how do these tools apply procurement-level rigor to personal shopping decisions?

  3. Which three active scam vectors target high-value professionals during the holiday season, and what mandatory four-point protocol ensures comprehensive protection against credential theft and device compromise?

In our conversation, we cover the following:

  • [00:00:00] Welcome to TSL Labs Bonus Episode: AI-powered deep dive on holiday shopping risks

  • [00:01:00] Why legal professionals abandon professional skepticism during holiday sales

  • [00:02:00] The high stakes: credential theft, device compromise, and operational lockdown

  • [00:03:00] The bargain trap: understanding technical debt in cheap vs. inexpensive hardware

  • [00:04:00] Processor bottleneck red flags: older generation chips that consume billable time

  • [00:05:00] Screen resolution hazards: how 1366x768 displays create genuine error risks

  • [00:06:00] RAM deficits and security longevity: when devices become e-waste and compliance gaps

  • [00:07:00] Introduction to forensic price tracking tools for procurement-level shopping

  • [00:08:00] CamelCamelCamel, Keepa, and Honey: free tools that reveal true pricing history

  • [00:09:00] Malwarebytes 2025 holiday scam report: three attack vectors targeting professionals

  • [00:10:00] Scam #1: urgent delivery smishing attacks exploiting package expectations

  • [00:11:00] Scam #2: malvertising minefield—when legitimate ads redirect to cloned fraud sites

  • [00:12:00] Scam #3: gift card emergency scams posing as court clerks and government officials

  • [00:13:00] Bonus threat: social media marketplace fraud and payment protection gaps

  • [00:14:00] The mandatory four-point protocol for holiday shopping protection

  • [00:15:00] Final thoughts: applying contract-reading diligence to every link you click

Resources

Hardware Mentioned in the Conversation

Software & Cloud Services Mentioned in the Conversation

📻 BONUS: Tech-Savvy Lawyer on Law Practice Today Podcast — Essential Trust Account Tips for Solo & Small Law Firms w/ Terrell Turner

🙏 Special Thanks to Terrell Turner and the ABA for having me on the Law Practice Today Podcast, produced by the Law Practice Division of the American Bar Association. We have an important discussion on trust account management. We cover essential insights on managing trust accounts using online services. This episode has been edited for time, but no information was altered. We are grateful to the ABA and the Law Practice Today Podcast for allowing us to share this valuable conversation with our audience.

🎯 Join Terrell and me as we discuss the following three questions and more!

  1. What precautions should lawyers using online services to manage trust accounts be aware of?

  2. How can solo and small firm attorneys find competent bookkeepers who understand legal trust accounting?

  3. What security measures should attorneys implement when using online payment processors for client funds?

⏱️ In our conversation, we cover the following:

00:00 – Introduction & Preview: Trust Accounts in the Digital Age

01:00 – Welcome to the Law Practice Today Podcast

01:30 – Today's Topic: Online Services for Payments

02:00 – Guest Introduction: Michael D.J. Eisenberg's Background

03:00 – Michael's Experience with Trust Accounts

04:00 – Challenges for Solo and Small Practitioners

05:00 – Ensuring Security in Online Services

06:00 – Questions to Ask Online Payment Providers

07:00 – Password Security & Two-Factor Authentication

08:00 – Finding a Competent Legal Bookkeeper

09:00 – Why 8AM Law Pay Works for Attorneys

10:00 – Daily Monitoring of Trust Accounts

11:00 – FDIC Insurance & Silicon Valley Bank Lessons

13:00 – Researching Trust Account Best Practices

15:00 – Closing Remarks & Podcast Information

📚 Resources

🔗 Connect with Terrell

💼 LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/terrellturner/

🌐 Website: https://www.tlturnergroup.com/

🎙️ Law Practice Today Podcast – https://lawpracticetoday.buzzsprout.com

📰 Mentioned in the Episode

💻 Software & Cloud Services Mentioned in the Conversation

  • 8AM Law Pay – Legal payment processing designed for trust account compliance – https://www.8am.com/lawpay/

  • 1Password – Password manager for generating and syncing complex passwords – https://1password.com/

  • LastPass – Mentioned as a password manager with noted security concerns – https://www.lastpass.com/

MTC (Holiday Special🎁): Cyber Monday 2025: A Lawyer’s Defense Against Holiday Scams and ‘Bargain’ Tech Traps

The “Billable Hour” Defense: Why That $300 Laptop and "Urgent" Delivery Text Are Liabilities, Not Deals

That “deal” for a “cheaper” computer may not be worth the lack of performance issues that come with a “cheap” computer!

As legal professionals, we are trained to spot inconsistencies in testimony, identify hidden clauses in contracts, and anticipate risks before they manifest. Yet, when the holiday shopping season arrives, the same skepticism that protects our clients often evaporates in the face of a 70% off sticker.

During Cyber Mondays, lawyers must tread carefully. The digital landscape is not just a marketplace; it is a hunting ground. For a law practice, the risks of holiday shopping go beyond a wasted purchase. A compromised device or a clicked phishing link can breach attorney-client privilege, trigger ethical violations, and lock down firm operations with ransomware.

Before you open your wallet or click that “track package” link, consider this your final briefing on the threats lurking behind the holiday hype.

The "Bargain" Trap: Why Cheap Tech is Expensive for Lawyers

We all love a deal. But in the world of legal technology, there is a profound difference between "inexpensive" and "cheap."

You may see "doorbuster" deals for laptops priced under $300. The marketing copy promises they are perfect for "light productivity" or "students." You might be tempted to pick one up for a paralegal, a home office, or even a law student family member.

Resist this impulse.

Tech experts and consumer watchdogs, including Lifehacker and PCMag, consistently warn about these "derivative" holiday models. Manufacturers often build specific units solely for Black Friday and Cyber Monday (SKUs [stock keeping unit] that do not exist the rest of the year). They achieve these rock-bottom prices by cutting corners that matter deeply to legal professionals:

  • The Processor Bottleneck: Many of these bargain laptops run on Celeron or Pentium chips (or older generations of Core i3). For a lawyer running practice management software, multiple PDF contracts, and video conferencing simultaneously, these processors are insufficient. The resulting lag isn't just annoying; it costs billable time.

  • The Screen Resolution Hazard: To save costs, these laptops often feature 1366 x 768 (720p) screens. In 2025, this is unacceptable for reviewing documents. The low resolution makes text pixelated and reduces the amount of a contract you can see on screen at once, increasing eye strain and the likelihood of missing a critical detail in a clause.

  • The RAM Deficit: 4GB of RAM is common in these deals. In a modern Windows environment, the operating system alone consumes nearly that much. Once you open a web browser with your firm's research tabs, the system will crawl.

  • Security Longevity: Perhaps most critically for a law firm, these bargain-bin devices often reach their "End of Service" life much faster. They may not support the latest secure operating systems or encryption standards required by your firm’s compliance insurance.

The Verdict: A $300 laptop that frustrates your staff and cannot handle encryption is not an asset; it is e-waste in the making. Stick to business-class hardware (Lenovo, HP, Dell, Apple, inter alia.) purchased through verified channels, even if it costs more. Your peace of mind is worth the premium.

BONUS: Price Tracking Tools

Successful online shopping during promotional periods requires distinguishing genuine discounts from artificial markups. Price tracking tools provide historical data that reveals authentic savings opportunities.

CamelCamelCamel tracks Amazon price history, creating visual charts showing price fluctuations over weeks, months, and years. This free tool sends email notifications when products drop below specified price thresholds and monitors both Amazon-direct and third-party seller pricing.

Honey extends beyond its widely-known coupon functionality to offer robust price tracking across multiple retailers through its "Droplist" feature. The browser extension automatically applies discount codes during checkout and compares prices across competing stores.

Keepa provides similar Amazon-focused price tracking with browser integration that displays historical pricing directly on Amazon product pages. The tool's detailed charts reveal seasonal patterns and help identify optimal purchase timing.

For legal professionals managing firm purchasing, enterprise-grade solutions such as Prisync, Price2Spy, and Competera offer comprehensive competitor monitoring, automated pricing adjustments, and real-time market data. These platforms serve businesses tracking multiple products across various marketplaces, but require subscription fees.

The Scam Landscape 2025: You Are a High-Value Target

Be wary when purchasing items online - always use a vpn when using public wifi!

According to Malwarebytes’ 2025 Holiday Scam report, shoppers are increasingly mobile, fast, and distracted. For lawyers, who are often managing high-stress caseloads alongside holiday obligations, this distraction is dangerous.

Scammers know that law firms move money. They know we manage sensitive data. And they know that during the holidays, our guards are down. Here are the three specific vectors attacking legal professionals this season.

1. The "Urgent Delivery" Smishing Attack
We all have packages in transit. You likely receive legitimate texts from Amazon, FedEx, or UPS daily. Scammers exploit this by sending "Smishing" (SMS phishing) messages claiming a package is "delayed" or "requires a delivery fee."

For a lawyer waiting on a court transcript or a client file, the instinct to "fix" the delivery issue is strong. But clicking that link often downloads malware or leads to a credential-harvesting site that looks identical to the courier’s login page.

  • The Defense: Never click a tracking link in a text message. Copy the tracking number and paste it directly into the courier’s official app or website. If the text doesn’t have a tracking number, it’s a scam.

2. The "Malvertising" Minefield
You are searching for a specific piece of hardware—perhaps a new scanner or ergonomic chair for the office. You see an ad on Google or social media for the exact item at a beat-to-beat price.

Malwarebytes warns that "Malvertising" (malicious advertising) is surging. Scammers buy ad space on legitimate platforms. When you click the ad, you aren't taken to the retailer; you are redirected to a cloned site designed to steal your credit card info, or worse, your firm’s login credentials.

  • The Defense: Treat ads as tips, not links. If you see a deal for a Dell monitor, close the ad and navigate manually to Dell.com or BestBuy.com to find it.

3. The "Gift Card" Emergency
This is a classic that has evolved. In the past, it was a fake email from the "Managing Partner" asking an associate to buy gift cards for a client. Now, it’s more sophisticated. Scammers may pose as court clerks or government officials, claiming a "fine" or "filing fee" must be paid immediately to avoid a bench warrant, and—due to a "system error"—they can only accept payment via gift cards or crypto.

  • The Defense: Courts do not accept gift cards. Period. If you receive an urgent financial demand via text or email, verify it by calling the person or entity on a known, public number.

The "Social" Threat: Marketplace Scams

Social media marketplaces (Facebook Marketplace, OfferUp) are now major hubs for holiday shopping. They are also unregulated.

A common scam involves a "seller" offering a high-demand item (like the latest iPad or game console) at a reasonable, but slightly low, price. They claim to be a local seller but then invent a reason why they can't meet up (e.g., "I'm deployed overseas," "I moved for work"). They ask for payment via Zelle or Venmo, promising to ship the item.

Once the money is sent, the seller vanishes. For a lawyer, the embarrassment of being defrauded is compounded by the potential exposure if you used a device or account linked to your firm.

Safeguarding the Firm: A Cyber Monday Protocol

The savings you made in buying the “cheaper” tech online may amount to the loss of much more, like the loss of client confidentiality and your license!

As you navigate the sales this week, apply the same rigor to your shopping as you do to your practice.

  1. Segregate Your Tech: Do not use your firm-issued laptop for personal holiday shopping. The risk of drive-by downloads from shady "deal" sites is too high.

  2. Credit, Not Debit: Always use a credit card, not a debit card. Credit cards offer robust fraud protection and do not expose your actual bank account funds.

  3. Two-Factor Everything: Ensure 2FA is enabled on your shopping accounts (Amazon, Walmart, etc.). If a scammer gets your password, 2FA is your last line of defense.

  4. The "Too Good to Be True" Rule: If a site you’ve never heard of is selling a MacBook for $500, it is a scam. Domain age checkers (like Whois) can reveal if a website was created yesterday—a sure sign of fraud.

Final Thoughts
Your data is your most valuable currency. No discount on a laptop or gadget is worth jeopardizing your firm’s integrity or your client’s trust. This Cyber Monday, shop smart, stay skeptical, and remember: if you wouldn't sign a contract without reading it, don't click a link without checking it.

🎙️🎁 TSL Labs Bonus: The Ultimate 2025 Tech Gift Guide for Attorneys — Expert-Curated Gadgets, AI Tools, and Must-Have Devices Every Lawyer Needs!

🎯 In this TSL Labs Bonus episode, we are experimenting with Google’s Notebook LLM to do a “Deep Dive” on our November 24th editorial on the ultimate 2025 tech gift guide for attorneys. We use this AI-powered conversation to unpack the key themes, ethical challenges, and actionable recommendations. Whether you're a solo practitioner, big law associate, or tech-curious partner, this episode delivers expert-curated insights on gadgets, AI tools, and must-have devices that support technological competence as a professional obligation.

If you're a busy legal professional seeking practical tech recommendations that enhance daily practice rather than collect digital dust, join us for this insightful conversation that explores how the right technology investments can improve your practice, safeguard your clients, and help prevent unnecessary bar complaints.

🤔 Join Google AI Deep Dive as they discuss the following three questions and more!

  1. What are the essential low-cost tech gifts under $25 that can make an immediate impact on an attorney's practice, and why do items like cables and tracking devices matter for professional competence?

  2. Which professional-grade tools under $100 deliver the best value for attorneys seeking to fulfill their ethical duty to work smarter and faster through AI integration and productivity enhancements?

  3. Why should premium technology investments over $100—including physical infrastructure like ergonomic chairs—be considered essential to an attorney's professional obligation to their clients?

In our conversation, we cover the following:

[00:00:00] — Episode introduction and TSL Labs Bonus overview

[00:01:00] — Navigating the perfect tech gift for attorneys: unique needs like security, portability, focus, and raw power

[00:02:00] — The three seismic forces driving tech choices: AI integration, cloud-based practice management, and heightened ethical duties

[00:03:00] — Target audience: solo practitioners, big law associates, and tech-curious partners who need technology that lasts

[00:04:00] — Essential low-cost gifts under $25: OWC Thunderbolt 4 USB-C cable and Apple AirTag for security and reliability

[00:05:00] — Productivity essentials: Logitech Pebble M350 silent mouse and Anker 7-in-1 USB-C Hub for presentations

[00:06:00] — AI tools for "forced competence": ChatGPT Plus one-month subscription as a low-risk nudge toward AI exploration

[00:07:00] — Professional grade tools under $100: Apple Pencil (1st Gen) for document annotation and Logitech MX Keys Mini keyboard

[00:08:00] — Focus and noise cancellation: Soundcore Space One headphones with 40+ hours battery life

[00:09:00] — Precision document navigation: Logitech MX Master 3S mouse with horizontal scrolling for wide documents

[00:10:00] — Premium mobile computing sweet spots: iPad Air with M3 chip ($599) and MacBook Air M4 ($999)

[00:11:00] — Physical infrastructure as health technology: Herman Miller Aeron chair ($1,351) for sustained high-quality work

[00:12:00] — Ultra-wide monitor benefits: LG 34" 5K 2K ($315) for seamless document comparison and reduced cognitive strain

[00:13:00] — Virtual practice essentials: Logitech Brio 4K webcam ($160) and Samsung T7 SSD ($109) for secure data management

[00:14:00] — The ultimate organizational hub: CalDigit TS3 Plus dock ($280) with 15 ports for cable clutter elimination

[00:15:00] — Strategic gift-giving advice: Understanding ecosystem (Apple, Windows, Android) and workflow considerations

📚 Resources

🖥️ Hardware Mentioned in the Conversation

Under $25:

  • OWC Thunderbolt 4 USB-C Cable (~$19.99) — Universal cable supporting 40Gb/s data, 100W power delivery, up to 8K video —(https://www.owc.com)

  • Apple AirTag (Single Pack) ($24) — Bluetooth tracking device using Find My network —(https://www.apple.com/airtag)

  • Logitech Pebble M350 Wireless Mouse (~$19.99) — Silent click, 90% noise reduction, 18-month battery — (https://www.logitech.com)

  • Anker 341 USB-C Hub (7-in-1) (~$19.99) — HDMI 4K@30Hz, USB ports, SD card slots — https://www.anker.com)

  • ORICLE 65W USB Travel Power Strip — Flat plug, 4-foot cord, 7-in-1 hub for travel —(https://oricotechs.com)

Under $100:

Premium Over $100:

  • iPad Air with M3 Chip (Starting at $599) — 8-core CPU, 9-core GPU, ideal balance of power and portability — (https://www.apple.com/ipad-air)

  • MacBook Air M4 (Starting at $999) — 10-core CPU, 10-core GPU, up to 18 hours battery life —(https://www.apple.com/macbook-air)

  • Herman Miller Aeron Chair (~$1,351) — Ergonomic office chair with PostureFit SL, three sizes for 1st-99th percentile —(https://www.hermanmiller.com)

  • LG 34" Ultrawide 5K 2K Monitor (~$315) — 3440x1440 resolution, curved display for seamless multitasking — (https://www.lg.com/us/monitors)

  • Logitech Brio 4K Ultra HD Webcam (~$160) — 4K@30fps, RightLight 3 HDR, adjustable 65°/78°/90° FOV — (https://www.logitech.com)

  • Samsung T7 Portable SSD (1TB) (~$109.99) — 1,050MB/s read speed, AES 256-bit encryption, 2m drop resistant — (https://www.samsung.com)

  • CalDigit TS3 Plus Thunderbolt 3 Dock (~$280) — 15 ports, 87W laptop charging, dual 4K display support — (https://www.caldigit.com)

💻 Software & Cloud Services Mentioned in the Conversation

  • ChatGPT Plus ($20/month) — OpenAI's premium AI assistant with GPT-4 access for research and drafting — (https://chat.openai.com)

  • Grammarly Premium (~$96/year on sale; $144/year regular) — AI-powered writing assistant with plagiarism detection —(https://www.grammarly.com)

  • Apple Find My — Location tracking app for AirTags and Apple devices — https://www.icloud.com/find

📌 Disclaimer: Prices mentioned throughout this episode and show notes are approximate and based on manufacturer suggested retail prices around the time of the publication date; actual pricing may vary depending on manufacturer availability, retailer promotions, seasonal sales, and geographic location, and we recommend verifying current pricing before making any purchase decisions.

🎙️ Ep. #125: Transforming Law Practice: Allison Johs on Legal Tech Productivity, AI Ethics & Automation Strategies.

My next guest is Allison Johs, former Chair of the ABA Legal Technology Resource Center and founder of Legal Ease Consulting. 🎯 Allison has spent nearly two decades helping law firms prevent "lawyer meltdown" by guiding them through digital transformation, boosting productivity, and providing practical tech solutions for modern legal professionals. With 15 years of practicing law and experience growing a firm from 15 to over 50 attorneys, Allison brings real-world expertise to the challenges lawyers face when balancing technology adoption with successful client service.

Join Allison Johs and me as we discuss the following three questions and more! 🤔

  1. What are the top three foundational mistakes lawyers make when implementing new legal technology, and how can solo and small firms avoid these pitfalls to ensure their technology investments actually improve their practice rather than just create additional complexity?

  2. What are your top three recommendations for lawyers who want to responsibly integrate AI into their practice while maintaining ethical compliance and ensuring client confidentiality?

  3. What are the top three technology-driven strategies lawyers can implement immediately to automate routine tasks and reclaim billable hours?

In our conversation, we cover the following: ⏱️

  • [00:00:00] – Episode introduction and guest welcome

  • [00:01:00] – Allison's current tech setup: Dell laptop, HP all-in-one desktop, Logitech Brio webcam, Microsoft 365

  • [00:02:00] – Discussion of portable monitors (INNOCN) and dual-screen productivity setups

  • [00:03:00] – Document scanning workflow with ScanSnap scanner and going paperless

  • [00:04:00] – OCR considerations for different practice areas, Adobe Acrobat for occasional OCR needs

  • [00:05:00]Mistake #1: Not considering roles of all people who will use the technology in the firm

  • [00:06:00] – Including staff input during technology selection and implementation

  • [00:07:00] – Coaching resistant employees through technology adoption

  • [00:08:00] – Addressing legitimate objections vs. fear of change; demonstrating value to staff

  • [00:09:00]Mistake #2: Not checking how new technology integrates with existing systems

  • [00:10:00] – Hidden costs of technology transitions: running parallel systems for 6-8 months

  • [00:11:00] – Budgeting for duplicate CRM/LPM subscriptions during migration

  • [00:12:00]Mistake #3: Failing to appropriately invest in ongoing training

  • [00:13:00] – Training new hires and keeping up with subscription software updates

  • [00:14:00]AI Recommendation #1: Thoroughly investigate how AI tools handle data, security, and training

  • [00:15:00]AI Recommendation #2: Setting and strictly enforcing AI usage policies; mandatory human review

  • [00:16:00] – The importance of reviewing AI outputs—lawyers should know precedents in their practice area

  • [00:17:00]AI Recommendation #3: Start with non-client-facing AI work (internal processes, marketing, financials)

  • [00:18:00] – Ethical considerations: using AI on published court decisions for legal analysis

  • [00:19:00] – Using AI to find contrary precedents and distinguishing cases

  • [00:20:00] – Duty to supervise: real-world consequences when AI use goes wrong

  • [00:21:00]Automation Strategy #1: Appointment booking tools (Calendly, Microsoft Bookings)

  • [00:22:00]Automation Strategy #2: Templates, document assembly, AI chatbots for client intake

  • [00:23:00]Automation Strategy #3: Automated time tracking and AI-powered billing review

  • [00:23:30] – Text Expander discussion: saving 2-5 hours weekly on repetitive typing

  • [00:24:00] – Allison's top automation tools: Calendly, Microsoft Power Automate, Microsoft Bookings

  • [00:25:00] – Discovering hidden features in Microsoft 365 (Ben Schorr webinar reference)

  • [00:26:00] – Using AI for travel planning: Google AI for trip itineraries, Perplexity AI for route optimization

  • [00:27:00] – Maximizing productivity during travel and conference attendance

  • [00:28:00] – Where to find Allison: websites, social media, and YouTube channel

Resources 📚

Connect with Allison Johs:

Mentioned in the Episode:

  • 📖 ABA Legal Technology Resource Centeramericanbar.org/groups/departments_offices/legal_technology_resources

  • 📖 How to Do More in Less Time (2nd Edition, 2023) – ABA Law Practice Division book co-authored by Allison Johs - https://www.amazon.com/How-More-Less-Time-Productivity/dp/1639052283

  • 📖 Make LinkedIn Work for You: A Practical Handbook for Lawyers and Other Legal Professionals – Co-authored with Dennis Kennedy - https://www.amazon.com/Make-LinkedIn-Work-You-Professionals/dp/1734076321

  • 👤 Ben Schorr – Microsoft 365 expert, now with Affinity Consulting Group - https://www.affinityconsulting.com/team/ben-m-schorr/

  • 🏛️ Universal Migrator – CRM/LPM data migration tool - https://www.universalmigrator.com/

Hardware Mentioned in the Conversation:

  • 💻 Dell Laptop - https://www.dell.com/en-us/shop/dell-laptops/scr/laptops?_gl=1*78tbrz*_up*MQ..*_gs*MQ..&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIgerxro6QkQMVdUpHAR0BUBUOEAAYASAAEgJ_R_D_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds

  • 🖥️ HP All-in-One Desktop Computer - https://www.hp.com/us-en/shop/vwa/desktops/form=All-in-One

  • 🖥️ INNOCN Portable Monitor (1080p mobile screen) – innocn.com

  • 📷 Logitech Brio Webcam (4K with built-in microphone) – logitech.com/brio

  • 🖨️ HP Printer - https://www.hp.com/us-en/shop/vwa/printers

  • 📄 Fujitsu ScanSnap Scanner (duplex document scanner) – scansnap.com

Software & Cloud Services Mentioned in the Conversation:

MTC: 🔒 Your AI Conversations Aren't as Private as You Think: What the OpenAI Court Ruling Means for Legal Professionals

A watershed moment in digital privacy has arrived, and it carries profound implications for lawyers and their clients.

The recent court ruling in In re: OpenAI, Inc., Copyright Infringement Litigation has exposed a critical vulnerability in the relationship between artificial intelligence tools and user privacy rights. On May 13, 2025, U.S. Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang issued an order requiring OpenAI to "preserve and segregate all output log data that would otherwise be deleted on a going forward basis". This unprecedented directive affected more than 400 million ChatGPT users worldwide and fundamentally challenged assumptions about data privacy in the AI era.[1][2][3][4]

While the court modified its order on October 9, 2025, terminating the blanket preservation requirement as of September 26, 2025, the damage to user trust and the precedent for future litigation remain significant. More importantly, the ruling illuminates a stark reality for legal professionals: the "delete" button offers an illusion of control rather than genuine data protection.

The Court Order That Changed Everything ⚖️

The preservation order emerged from a copyright infringement lawsuit filed by The New York Times against OpenAI in December 2023. The Times alleged that OpenAI unlawfully used millions of its articles to train ChatGPT without permission or compensation. During discovery, concerns arose that OpenAI had been deleting user conversations that could potentially demonstrate copyright violations.

Judge Wang's response was sweeping. The court ordered OpenAI to retain all ChatGPT output logs, including conversations users believed they had permanently deleted, temporary chats designed to auto-delete after sessions, and API-generated outputs regardless of user privacy settings. The order applied retroactively, meaning conversations deleted months or even years earlier remained archived in OpenAI's systems.

OpenAI immediately appealed, arguing the order was overly broad and compromised user privacy. The company contended it faced conflicting obligations between the court's preservation mandate and "numerous privacy laws and regulations throughout the country and the world". Despite these objections, Judge Wang denied OpenAI's motion, prioritizing the preservation of potential evidence over privacy concerns.

The October 9, 2025 stipulation and order brought partial relief. OpenAI's ongoing obligation to preserve all new output log data terminated as of September 26, 2025. However, all data preserved before that cutoff remains accessible to plaintiffs (except for users in the European Economic Area, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom). Additionally, OpenAI must continue preserving output logs from specific domains identified by the New York Times and may be required to add additional domains as the litigation progresses.

Privacy Rights in the Age of AI: An Eroding Foundation 🛡️

This case demonstrates that privacy policies are not self-enforcing legal protections. Users who relied on OpenAI's representations about data deletion discovered those promises could be overridden by court order without their knowledge or consent. The "temporary chat" feature, marketed as providing ephemeral conversations, proved anything but temporary when litigation intervened.

The implications extend far beyond this single case. The ruling establishes that AI-generated content constitutes discoverable evidence subject to preservation orders. Courts now view user conversations with AI not as private exchanges but as potential legal records that can be compelled into evidence.

For legal professionals, this reality is particularly troubling. Lawyers regularly handle sensitive client information that must remain confidential under both ethical obligations and the attorney-client privilege. The court order revealed that even explicitly deleted conversations may be retained indefinitely when litigation demands it.

The Attorney-Client Privilege Crisis 👥

Attorney-client privilege protects confidential communications between lawyers and clients made for the purpose of obtaining or providing legal advice. This protection is fundamental to the legal system. However, the privilege can be waived through voluntary disclosure to third parties outside the attorney-client relationship.

When lawyers input confidential client information into public AI platforms like ChatGPT, they potentially create a third-party disclosure that destroys privilege. Many generative AI systems learn from user inputs, incorporating that information into their training data. This means privileged communications could theoretically appear in responses to other users' queries.

The OpenAI preservation order compounds these concerns. It demonstrates that AI providers cannot guarantee data will be deleted upon request, even when their policies promise such deletion. Lawyers who used ChatGPT's temporary chat feature or deleted sensitive conversations believing those actions provided privacy protection now discover their confidential client communications may be preserved indefinitely as litigation evidence.

The risk is not theoretical. In the now-famous Mata v. Avianca, Inc. case, a lawyer used a free version of ChatGPT to draft a legal brief containing fabricated citations. While the lawyer faced sanctions for submitting false information to the court, legal ethics experts noted the confidentiality implications of the increasingly specific prompts the attorney used, which may have revealed client confidential information.

ABA Model Rules and AI: What Lawyers Must Know 📋

The American Bar Association's Model Rules of Professional Conduct govern lawyer behavior, and while these rules predate generative AI, they apply with full force to its use. On July 29, 2024, the ABA Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility issued Formal Opinion 512, providing the first comprehensive guidance on lawyers' use of generative AI.

Model Rule 1.1: Competence requires lawyers to provide competent representation, including maintaining "legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness and preparation reasonably necessary for representation". The rule's commentary [8] specifically states lawyers must understand "the benefits and risks associated with relevant technology". Opinion 512 clarifies that lawyers need not become AI experts, but must have a "reasonable understanding of the capabilities and limitations of the specific GenAI technology" they use. This is not a one-time obligation. Given AI's rapid evolution, lawyers must continuously update their understanding.

Model Rule 1.6: Confidentiality creates perhaps the most significant ethical challenge for AI use. The rule prohibits lawyers from revealing "information relating to the representation of a client" and requires them to "make reasonable efforts to prevent the inadvertent or unauthorized disclosure of, or unauthorized access to, information relating to the representation". Self-learning AI tools that train on user inputs create substantial risk of improper disclosure. Information entered into public AI systems may be stored, processed by third-party vendors, and potentially accessed by company employees or incorporated into model training. Opinion 512 recommends lawyers obtain informed client consent before inputting any information related to representation into AI systems. Lawyers must also thoroughly review the terms of use, privacy policies, and contractual agreements of any AI tool they employ.

Model Rule 1.4: Communication obligates lawyers to keep clients reasonably informed about their representation. When using AI tools, lawyers should disclose this fact to clients, particularly when the AI processes client information or could impact the representation. Clients have a right to understand how their matters are being handled and what technologies may access their confidential information.[25][22][20][21]

Model Rule 3.3: Candor Toward the Tribunal requires lawyers to be truthful in their representations to courts. AI systems frequently produce "hallucinations"—plausible-sounding but entirely fabricated information, including fake case citations. Lawyers remain fully responsible for verifying all AI outputs before submitting them to courts or relying on them for legal advice. The Mata v. Avianca case serves as a cautionary tale of the consequences when lawyers fail to fulfill this obligation.

Model Rules 5.1 and 5.3: Supervisory Responsibilities make lawyers responsible for the conduct of other lawyers and nonlawyer assistants working under their supervision. When staff members use AI tools, supervising lawyers must ensure appropriate policies, training, and oversight exist to prevent ethical violations.

Model Rule 1.5: Fees requires lawyers to charge reasonable fees. Opinion 512 addresses whether lawyers can bill clients for time "saved" through AI efficiency gains. The guidance suggests that when using hourly billing, efficiencies gained through AI should benefit clients. However, lawyers may pass through reasonable direct costs of AI services (such as subscription fees) when properly disclosed and agreed upon in advance.

State-by-State Variations: A Patchwork of Protection 🗺️

While the ABA Model Rules provide a national framework, individual states adopt and interpret ethics rules differently. Legal professionals must understand their specific state's requirements, which can vary significantly.[2

Lawyers must protect client’s PII from AI privacy failures!

Florida has taken a proactive stance. In January 2025, The Florida Bar Board of Governors unanimously approved Advisory Opinion 24-1, which specifically addresses generative AI use. The opinion recommends lawyers obtain "affected client's informed consent prior to utilizing a third-party generative AI program if the utilization would involve the disclosure of any confidential information". Florida's guidance emphasizes that lawyers remain fully responsible for AI outputs and cannot treat AI as a substitute for legal judgment.

Texas issued Opinion 705 from its State Bar Professional Ethics Committee in February 2025. The opinion outlines four key obligations: lawyers must reasonably understand AI technology before using it, exercise extreme caution when inputting confidential information into AI tools that might store or expose client data, verify the accuracy of all AI outputs, and avoid charging clients for time saved by AI efficiency gains. Texas also emphasizes that lawyers should consider informing clients when AI will be used in their matters.

New York has developed one of the most comprehensive frameworks through its State Bar Association Task Force on Artificial Intelligence. The April 2024 report provides a thorough analysis across the full spectrum of ethical considerations, including competence, confidentiality, client communication, billing practices, and access to justice implications. New York's guidance stands out for addressing both immediate practical considerations and longer-term questions about AI's transformation of the legal profession.

Alaska issued Ethics Opinion 2025-1 surveying AI issues with particular focus on competence, confidentiality, and billing. The opinion notes that when using non-closed AI systems (such as general consumer products), lawyers should anonymize prompts to avoid revealing client confidential information. Alaska's guidance explicitly cites to its cloud-computing predecessor opinion, treating AI data storage similarly to law firm files on third-party remote servers.

California, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Oregon have issued guidance through their state attorneys general on how existing state privacy laws apply to AI. California's advisories emphasize that AI use must comply with the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), requiring transparency, respecting individual data rights, and limiting data processing to what is "reasonably necessary and proportionate". Massachusetts focuses on consumer protection, anti-discrimination, and data security requirements. Oregon highlights that developers using personal data to train AI must clearly disclose this use and obtain explicit consent when dealing with sensitive data.[31]

These state-specific approaches create a complex compliance landscape. A lawyer practicing in multiple jurisdictions must understand and comply with each state's requirements. Moreover, state privacy laws like the CCPA and similar statutes in other states impose additional obligations beyond ethics rules.

Enterprise vs. Consumer AI: Understanding the Distinction 💼

Not all AI tools pose equal privacy risks. The OpenAI preservation order highlighted critical differences between consumer-facing products and enterprise solutions.

Consumer Plans (Free, Plus, Pro, and Team) were fully subject to the preservation order. These accounts store user conversations on OpenAI's servers with limited privacy protections. While users can delete conversations, the court order demonstrated that those deletions are not permanent. OpenAI retains the technical capability to preserve and access this data when required by legal process.

Enterprise Accounts offer substantially stronger privacy protections. ChatGPT Enterprise and Edu plans were excluded from the preservation order's broadest requirements. These accounts typically include contractual protections such as Data Processing Agreements (DPAs), commitments against using customer data for model training, and stronger data segregation. However, even enterprise accounts must preserve data when covered by specific legal orders.

Zero Data Retention Agreements provide the highest level of protection. Users who have negotiated such agreements with OpenAI are excluded from data preservation requirements. These arrangements ensure that user data is not retained beyond the immediate processing necessary to generate responses.

For legal professionals, the lesson is clear: consumer-grade AI tools are inappropriate for handling confidential client information. Lawyers who use AI must ensure they employ enterprise-level solutions with proper contractual protections, or better yet, closed systems where client data never leaves the firm's control.

Practical Steps for Legal Professionals: Protecting Privilege and Privacy 🛠️

Given these risks, what should lawyers do? Abandoning AI entirely is neither realistic nor necessary. Instead, legal professionals must adopt a risk-management approach.

Conduct thorough due diligence before adopting any AI tool. Review terms of service, privacy policies, and data processing agreements in detail. Understand exactly what data the AI collects, how long it's retained, whether it's used for model training, who can access it, and what security measures protect it. If these answers aren't clear from public documentation, contact the vendor directly for written clarification.

Implement written AI policies for your firm or legal department. These policies should specify which AI tools are approved for use, what types of information can (and cannot) be input into AI systems, required safeguards such as data anonymization, client consent requirements, verification procedures for AI outputs, and training requirements for all staff. Document these policies and ensure all lawyers and staff understand and follow them.

Default to data minimization. Before inputting any information into an AI system, ask whether it's necessary. Can you accomplish the task without including client-identifying information? Many AI applications work effectively with anonymized or hypothetical scenarios that don't reveal actual client matters. When in doubt, err on the side of caution.

Obtain informed client consent when using AI for client matters, particularly when inputting any information related to the representation. This consent should be specific about what AI tools will be used, what information may be shared with those tools, what safeguards are in place, and what risks exist despite those safeguards. General consent buried in engagement agreements is likely insufficient.

Use secure, purpose-built legal AI tools rather than consumer applications. Legal-specific AI products are designed with confidentiality requirements in mind and typically offer stronger privacy protections. Even better, consider closed-system AI that operates entirely within your firm's infrastructure without sending data to external servers.

Never assume deletion means erasure. The OpenAI case proves that deleted data may not be truly gone. Treat any information entered into an AI system as potentially permanent, regardless of what the system's privacy settings claim.

Maintain privileged communication protocols. Remember that AI is not your attorney. Communications with AI systems are not protected by attorney-client privilege. Never use AI as a substitute for consulting with qualified colleagues or outside counsel on genuinely privileged matters.

Stay informed about evolving guidance. AI technology and the regulatory landscape are both changing rapidly. Regularly review updates from your state bar association, the ABA, and other professional organizations. Consider attending continuing legal education programs on AI ethics and technology competence.

Final thoughts: The Future of Privacy Rights in an AI World 🔮

The OpenAI preservation order represents a pivotal moment in the collision between AI innovation and privacy rights. It exposes uncomfortable truths about the nature of digital privacy in 2025: privacy policies are subject to override by legal process, deletion features provide psychological comfort rather than technical and legal certainty, and third-party service providers cannot fully protect user data from discovery obligations.

For legal professionals, these realities demand a fundamental reassessment of how AI tools fit into practice. The convenience and efficiency AI provides must be balanced against the sacred duty to protect client confidences and maintain the attorney-client privilege. This is not an abstract concern or distant possibility. It is happening now, in real courtrooms, with real consequences for lawyers and clients.

State bars and regulators are responding, but the guidance remains fragmented and evolving. Federal privacy legislation addressing AI has yet to materialize, leaving a patchwork of state laws with varying requirements. In this environment, legal professionals cannot wait for perfect clarity before taking action.

The responsibility falls on each lawyer to understand the tools they use, the risks those tools create, and the steps necessary to fulfill ethical obligations in this new technological landscape. Ignorance is not a defense. "I didn't know the AI was storing that information" will not excuse a confidentiality breach or privilege waiver.

As AI becomes increasingly embedded in legal practice, the profession must evolve its approach to privacy and confidentiality. The traditional frameworks remain sound—the attorney-client privilege, the duty of confidentiality, the requirement of competence—but their application requires new vigilance. Lawyers must become technology stewards as well as legal advisors, understanding not just what the law says, but how the tools they use might undermine their ability to protect it.

The OpenAI case will not be the last time courts grapple with AI data privacy. As generative AI proliferates and litigation continues, more preservation orders, discovery disputes, and privilege challenges are inevitable. Legal professionals who fail to address these issues proactively may find themselves explaining to clients, judges, or disciplinary authorities why they treated confidential information so carelessly.

Privacy in the AI age demands more than passive reliance on vendor promises. It requires active, informed engagement with the technology we use and honest assessment of the risks we create. For lawyers, whose professional identity rests on the foundation of client trust and confidentiality, nothing less will suffice. The court ruling has made one thing abundantly clear: when it comes to AI and privacy, what you don't know can definitely hurt you—and your clients. ⚠️

📢 ANNOUNCEMENT: Tech-Savvy Saturdays Takes a Brief Hiatus - Continuing to Empower Lawyers with Legal Tech Insights Through Blogs and Podcasts.

Hey everyone!

My goal with Tech-Savvy Saturdays (TSS) is to consistently serve as a cornerstone resource for legal professionals seeking to navigate the evolving landscape of legal technology. Due to other obligations, I need to take a pause on TSS.  But fear not, TSS will return in several months. Meanwhile, you can still stay updated on all things legal tech through the Tech-Savvy Lawyer Blog and Podcast.

Stay safe and Tech-Savvy!

Your Friend,
Michael D.J.

🎙️ Ep. 119: Steve Fretzin Reveals Essential Tech Tools Every Solo Lawyer Needs to Dominate The Competition!

Our next guest is Steve Fretzin. Steve is a renowned business development coach and host of the "Be That Lawyer" podcast. He is dedicated to helping attorneys grow their practices through modern, client-focused strategies that eliminate the discomfort of traditional sales tactics. With decades of experience, Steve's mission is to equip lawyers with the tools they need to build sustainable practices, manage their time more effectively, and cultivate lasting client relationships.

In this conversation, Steve outlines the critical technology skills that can transform a solo practice from merely surviving to truly thriving, and many more.

Join Steve and me as we discuss the following three questions and more!

  1. As you counsel attorneys transitioning from large law firms to solo practice, what are the top three tech skills you believe a solo practitioner must develop to not just survive, but to truly excel and stand out from the competition?

  2. Many lawyers feel overwhelmed by the rapid pace of technological change. What are your top three strategies for attorneys who want to embrace technology but don't know where to start?

  3. Looking ahead, what are the top three emerging technologies, such as AI and automation, that are reshaping the legal industry? And what are the top three steps lawyers should take now to prepare for these changes, both to improve their own practices and to better serve their clients?

In our conversation, we cover the following:

[00:35] Steve's Current Tech Setup

[13:14] Top Tech Skills for Solo Practitioners

[19:49] Strategies for Embracing Technology

[26:04] Emerging Technologies in the Legal Industry and Preparing for Technological Changes

[33:40] Steve's Book and Podcast

Resources:

Connect with Steve:

Mentioned in the episode:

Hardware mentioned in the conversation:

Software & Cloud Services mentioned in the conversation:

Transcript

The Tech Savvy Lawyer Ep 119 Steve Fretzin, Final

[00:00:00]

Title Read

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Episode 119, Steve Fritz reveals essential tech tools. Every solo lawyer needs to dominate the competition.

Introduction

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: My next guest is Steve Fritz from Be That Lawyer. Steve shares three critical tech skills every solo practitioner must master to not just survive but soar about the competition from paperless workflows to AI powered content creation. Discover the technology strategies that separate thriving solo practices from struggling ones.

Plus, Steve reveals his game changing tech stack and why going 100% paperless transformed his business. All this and more. Enjoy.

Ad Read #1: Consider Giving The Tech-Savvy Lawyer.Page Podcast A Five-Star ⭐️ Review!

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Have you been enjoying the Tech Savvy Laura Page podcast? Consider giving us a five star review on Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcast feeds.

Welcoming Our Guest!

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Steve, I appreciate you being here.

Our Guest Current Tech Setup!

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: What is your current tech setup?

Steve Fritzen: Current tech [00:01:00] setup is, I've got a Mac computer and I've got an Apogee. Microphone for podcasting and also it, it helps me tune out my dog, who sleeps on the floor and snores all day. I was teaching a class, I teach classes for lawyers every Tuesday and my dog's just, just grinding and just snoring like a train.

And I didn't think they could hear it through my computer, through my Mac computer. And I go, can you guys hear that? They're like, oh yeah, we've been hearing him snore. For the last hour, and I was like, okay, so I gotta move to my great microphone, , which will drown it out a little bit. So, but I've got the, you know, multiple screens.

I got two screens, and I'm working off a matic for my CRM. I've got, oh, I am a hundred percent paperless. Okay. So I've got my remarkable two notepad. Oh. And, and I absolutely love it. You know, part of what I'm trying to emulate for my clients is Efficiency organization. My inbox, and I'm using a Gmail platform, but my inbox is always at a zero at the end of every day.

Like I'm really is pretty [00:02:00] highly organized, which is the only way I can function at this point.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Well, you've raised several questions for me. First, I gotta ask now, how new is your Mac? Does it have one of the famous M Chipps in it? Is it an old Intel?

Steve Fritzen: That is a great question. The Apple M1 chip, eight gigabyte, and I wanna say it's maybe two years old.

It's a 24 inch. M1. Okay. Yeah. So I just want something that's gonna start and work and I, you know, I like to have the fingerprint to get it going and not have to put in a password all the time. And it's a great computer. It's really given me no issues at all. And that's why I'm a big fan of Mac. Just because I really just, I mean, other than occasionally the, uh, the way they call it the wheel of death, which I don't really see anymore 'cause it's a newer Mac.

As long as I keep it, keep it empty, like I've got an external hard drive. So all of the videos and audios and I'm recording. Mm-hmm. Hundreds and hundreds of hours of stuff. Right. And I was putting it on my computer, not realizing, you know, how much I was filling it up until it told me, Steve, you're outta space.

I'm like, what? Now? Everything automatically goes right into [00:03:00] the, I set it up so that all of my recordings, everything goes right into the hard drive, which is massive. Like, I dunno, it's like two terabytes or something like that. So this Mac is pretty clean, so hold on. Is this a laptop or a desktop? It's a desktop.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Okay. Yeah. And so is it the Mac Studio or the Mac Mini?

Steve Fritzen: Ooh. That's a great question. I don't know. I think it's just a, a standard. I'll tell you, I'm pulling it up right now.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: So it's go your apple. It's what if you go on your menu bar Apple? Yeah. I, I

Steve Fritzen: pulled, I pulled that up. So it says it's an iMac. Oh, okay.

It's Apple. Apple M1. Okay. Eight gigabyte Mac os Ventura.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Okay.

Steve Fritzen: And yeah, so that's, any other details beyond that? I'm not sure. Cool.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: And what external hard drives are you using?

Steve Fritzen: Alright. I've got a silicon power SP armor that I'm using. I don't know where or how I picked it up, but I just found it in a box.

I'm like, this'll work. I had a Mac guy come over who helped me with it because I just, you know, I'm not as tech savvy on all the details of this stuff. I just don't wanna make a mistake. Like, [00:04:00] that's my biggest fear with, with anything is, you know, I, oh, I'll just erase a bunch of this stuff. I don't need it anyway.

And then it's connected on all my devices and I'm erasing it from all my devices. 'cause I didn't have a setting just right or something. So I freak out about that stuff. So I always bring in somebody to help me. And this was one of those situations where he's like, do you have an external hardware? I'm like, yeah, in this box.

I grabbed it and he's like, all right, let's set it up. And then he. Help me, you know, create it so that I'm not, I'm really keeping my computer pretty clean.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: What are you using for backup?

Steve Fritzen: Oh my God, I'm really a Dropbox guy, so I'm putting everything into Dropbox. So even the stuff that goes into the external hard drive, that's the depository for Zoom to dump things into, right?

And then I immediately move it. I create names and folders, and I put it all, I bring it over, I drive it over to my Dropbox. That way we can do editing and we have access to everything, and my assistant has accessed to everything on Dropbox. Yeah.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Are you backing up like the whole computer at all, or just the files?

Steve Fritzen: That's a great question. I'm pretty sure I have an iCloud going on as well on a regular basis, [00:05:00] but it's mostly files that are being brought up on the Dropbox. Is that a mistake? Should I be. Well, there's a concept

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: of a 3, 2, 1. For every computer, you should have two different locations and three total backups.

Okay, so some people say that Dropbox is or isn't an actual backup. I consider it to be a backup. So I do use Dropbox as one backup. The next backup I use is called Backblaze, that back up the entire computer. The third I use is my time machine, which also backs up the entire computer. The fourth that I use is Sonology, which actually houses my time machine hard drives.

So, but that can also serve as an additional backup for other larger files. That's where I store all of my older recordings, because I don't need them on the main computer. So having a 3, 2, 1 backup notice that the. Time machine is here on site and the back blaze and the Dropbox are both. In the cloud elsewhere.

Mm-hmm. So that's how I sort of cover things just to make sure that, [00:06:00] heavens forbid one of them goes down, I got another redundant backup somewhere else.

Steve Fritzen: Interesting.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: And then I think about Backblaze runs in the background. You have, you know, it's just continuously running and I don't have to worry about.

Losing stuff, unless of course the power goes down, then hopefully between the three of them I've got enough. One of the three actually caught it. Enough redundancy. But you know, to go really paranoid, you know, you were talking about the iMac that you have. I'm using a Mac studio for my main computer, for my day job and my night job, and that's got an, I put in an eight terabyte.

Hard drive in that. And I did that just recently 'cause I was filling up my Mac studio with an M1 chip that only had two terabytes and that was filling up too quickly. So I have that extra room. And then I also have a laptop that I travel with. So my MacBook, which has got an M four chip in it and. I think four terabytes of hard drive space serves as sort of an extra redundant backup.

'cause it has a copy of all of my files through Dropbox. So, you [00:07:00] know, being the lawyer, being really paranoid. I think I've got, I guess, five or six backups, which yeah, hopefully, heaven forbid I'll never need. But I'm curious, so. What do you use for a smartphone?

Steve Fritzen: This is an iPhone 14 Pro.

What other questions can I answer about that?

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: That pretty much just answers that hundred

Steve Fritzen: 28 gigabyte.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Yeah,

Steve Fritzen: and I mean, again, this is a phone where I've really had very few issues,

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: which is the best things, like you said about all Apple products. Yeah. I just,

Steve Fritzen: yeah, we have so many stressors in our lives.

Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm. Technology, they can be put at the top of the list if you mm-hmm. You don't have a good product or you don't have. Things configurated properly. So I really am trying to be very careful about what I buy and how I use it with the limited knowledge I have that right, I'm gonna be protected and, and things are backed up properly and that I'm not making mistakes.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: So, do you use an iPad or a tablet?

Steve Fritzen: I only use an iPad for reading apps and like YouTube and stuff like that. It's like more of a, like I had this, like, there was a time where I was [00:08:00] gonna use my iPad for like taking notes instead. Mm-hmm. But I couldn't, it didn't feel like paper and it just was very slippery and my handwringing is terrible and it just wasn't easy to use for that particular thing.

So that's why I got the remarkable two, which is like the greatest invention for. For me that I, I maybe since my smartphone came out, I mean, it's that important in my life. And then I just separate business from pleasure and like the iPad is really just a, it's a tool for enjoying media,

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: right? A media content device.

Yeah. Which I agree with you. I too have very poor penmanship. And what is it about the remarkable that you like, that you found yourself buying another device?

Steve Fritzen: Yeah. And it's not cheap, but it's like I always say, and I've gotten like dozens of people on it because mm-hmm. They're, I see they have notebooks of handwritten, multiple notebooks.

It's like, all right, so I want you to find somebody from a year ago, and how are you gonna do that in a minute? 30 seconds, you're not, you're gonna have to go and you're gonna have to start tooling through all these notebooks to [00:09:00] find your notes about something that happened with the front of your. So first of all, as I mentioned, it writes like paper.

It feels like paper when you're writing. Number two is I bought the pen with the eraser on the end. It's a virtual eraser. And so my hand, so I'll write the word. I'll write the word lovely. Okay. And the last three letters of that word are completely unreadable, legible, right. So I can just flip my pen around.

Erase it. Mm-hmm. Slow down. Right, right. Finish it out and it's set. So, I mean, just the ease of taking notes, erasing, and then rewriting. That's sort of like the standard that I need to have. And then the ability for it, it backs up to its own cloud. Right. And I back it up to Dropbox, right? So all these notes and all this stuff can be put into, and I've got a file on everyone.

I've got a file mm-hmm. On every client. I've got a file on every event I've done, I've got an event on just, I mean, I've got everything broken into categories. So I can either use the search tool at the top and I'll put in the word like, [00:10:00] like ai. And it'll, mm-hmm. That'll pull up all the folders where the AI is in there, or it might be where I've gotta pull up, my client's name is Stewart Johnson.

And I, I just type in Stewart, it pulls up it, and then I've got all of the notes about him. So right before a meeting, 15 minutes before a meeting. Mm-hmm. I'm totally prepared. Remembering that he's got three kids, two of them are twins, right? He loves the Cubs and he's gonna be out in my neighborhood in the next, you know, two weeks or whatever, whatever it might be.

Like. I'm gonna be in a really good position to pull up things quickly. You can take PDFs. So I'm in a national group locally called Provisor. If you're familiar with visors, but I run one of the larger groups in the Chicagoland area, and so like I have an agenda that I write up for the, for the meeting.

I put in A PDF, upload the PDF onto my remarkable two, and then I can write on top of it. So I've got an agenda to follow that's on the screen and then I'm writing on time. There's all kinds of ways to layer and things like that, but I don't really , use it for that. So for me, just get, I had. Just stacks of like post-it notes and stacks of like [00:11:00] files and everything was everywhere and I just needed to get organized.

And the remarkable two is kind of the final piece of the puzzle that solved. Solved my riddle of organization.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Well, before we get into the questions, I'm gonna share one little tech app suggestion. I use a program called who, Topo, H-O-U-D-D-A-H, which is sort of like a finder on steroids. Now, the next version of the Mac.

OS is supposed to have a better finder spotlight program, but I've been using this for years and I absolutely love it because it really helps me get into the granular of what I'm looking for. You know, a particular type of document, you know, A PDF, A word with a specific name created within a certain timeframe that has a particular word in it somewhere, and either buy it individually or get as part of a subscription app that I use called Setup, which gives you access to like over a hundred applications. Many, not all of them, but many of them that I use and I pay like 10 bucks a month which is not bad. No, but what's get into the questions.

Q?#1:  What are the top three tech skills you believe a solo practitioner must develop to not just survive, but to truly excel and stand out from the competition?

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Question number [00:12:00] one, as you counsel attorneys transitioning from large law firms to solo practice. What are the top three tech skills you believe a solo practitioner must develop to not just survive, but to truly excel and stand out from the competition? Yeah,

Steve Fritzen: that's a great question. And by the way, the transition of, because of technology and because of automation and virtual assistants and virtual.

You know, not having to have a very, I mean, the transition from big law, mid-market, anything into solo is so much easier than it's ever been, especially if you have a book of business and you're able to bring it with you and have that comfort of knowing you've got. Hundreds of thousands of dollars coming with you because that's gonna, you know, alleviate the stress of, and the financial burden of starting something from nothing.

But I think back in the day, you know, you'd have to have an office and an assistant and a phone, someone answer the phone mm-hmm. Signage and all this big money investment. And today it's like, Hey, just set up in your home. Put up a, you know, I think a, you know, an inexpensive, you know, Squarespace, whatever website.

I [00:13:00] even tell lawyers, you don't even really need a website. It, it's helpful. It's helpful, but when you're first starting off, the first six months, as long as you have a good LinkedIn page mm-hmm. That your website, I mean, for six months. So you can make some money. If you don't have any, just use your LinkedIn page.

That's where people are going 60% of the time anyway, before they would go to a website. So I would say number one is you have to understand, I mean. Figuring out like what you wanna do and how you wanna spend your time. Mm-hmm. And then what you want to delegate and what software automation, va, whatever it might be.

Most of the people that make have regrets when they mm-hmm. Go off on their own is to not hire a bookkeeper from day one. So that's not a tech. There are, I'm sure tech tools for that. You could probably help me with that. But, you know, just having someone for. You know, $500 a month that really just takes all the bookkeeping can set up your QuickBooks, can set up your profit and loss, set up everything you need, you know, how you invoice anything and everything around that.

The second thing is you need to figure out what your tech [00:14:00] stack's gonna be. What's your practice management Software's gonna be. Is it Cleo? Is it Practice Panther, smoke Ball. And then are there gonna be any add-ons to that, meaning CRM, Matic, you know, how are you going to, you know, keep track of your pipeline and things like that?

Most attorneys, when they're starting out, they just want to get a basic practice management system, and I think. You have to evaluate the top five and make a decision, obviously going to the, do you go to a legal tech show in Chicago every year? Oh, the a BA tech show? Yeah.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Yes. I presented last summer as a matter of fact.

Okay. Okay. But I've been going for the last five or six years. Yeah.

Steve Fritzen: And I go and I walk the floor and I see, mm-hmm. What's, it was a very AI heavy as no one support. Oh yeah. By. Oh yeah, I'm not sure. I'm a huge fan of the, the venue change this year to the big, what's it called? The McCormick? Yeah, McCormick Play because it, yeah, the McCormick play's just so massive and it just didn't feel as intimate as it had at the Hyatt in the past.

That's that they, I think they signed a long term contract, so can't turn back from that. But I think you want to evaluate all the different practice management softwares and just see, based on the type of practice you have, what are you looking to stay [00:15:00] solo? Are you looking to scale quickly? Which one is gonna best, what's their support like?

Right. How much time, how much help do you need? In the big two things, I think with, with new softwares, number one is. Who's helping with customization, right? Are you trying to figure it out? Like you're someone that I think Michael could probably figure out how to customize a software like on your own.

I'm not gonna do that. I need someone that I say, this is what I wanted to do these things and then I, there's things I don't know that I need you to tell me it probably should do. And I did that with Law Manx, for example. I'm not a lawyer, but I have Law Mads and I, I talk about it quite a bit and I've had, you know, the gang on my show a bunch of times and on my podcast and all that.

And ultimately. If I need someone to configure it and customize it for me and my needs, and then I need someone to train me on it. Right? And so if you need to. Those two things. You wanna find a practice management that's not only quality, but where they're gonna really help you set it up so that you're not figuring it out and wasting, you know, countless hours on it on your own.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: You know, I find it interesting is that a lot of the law practice [00:16:00] management programs, I shouldn't say a lot, but the law Pro practice management programs are starting to have their own conferences. CLE con's, been around for a while, file vin's doing it. I think my case is gonna do a virtual conference.

And the attendees I've noticed, uh, tend to be very enthusiastic about their product. You know, that they're using so much so that they're willing to spend, , the extra money to come out to wherever the conference may be and learn more and get really ingratiated into the product.

Steve Fritzen: Yeah, that's a pretty common effect that.

Technology. I mean, you went to the mm-hmm. Or you're going to the Apple, the Apple Conference here in Chicago you mentioned. Yeah. So like people that are passionate about software or, or a product like Apple, they're gonna go for it. D and there's a lot to learn it. I think it goes beyond just the product.

I think they want to network with other people who share a similar. Interest or that, you know, maybe in a similar size practice, things like that. So I think there's a lot of value in those conferences.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: But also the one thing that I like is you learn from others how they do things differently. Yeah. And that's sort of the purpose of this [00:17:00] podcast is so that other lawyers and legal professionals can learn how other lawyers are doing what they do, but maybe just a little bit differently.

And if they can pick up that one tip or trick that saves them time and money, all the better. So I think that was two. I gotta get one more outta

Steve Fritzen: uh, one more outta me. So we, all right. So Bookkeeper, I would say practice management software. And I would also say really consider like what platform you're on.

Is it Outlook, is it Gmail? Again, what's the scalability? What are they offering from a standpoint of an email base? Or it could be, you know, just the ease of use. For building it out, and I, I don't dive too deeply into that. I just know that you gotta kind of pick a, you got, it's like Apple or, or like a Mac or a pc.

Like you gotta pick a direction. I'm a Gmail similar to, to Apple. I'm a Apple guy and I'm a Gmail guy, and you put Outlook and PC in front of me. I'm not real interested in it.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Cool. Let's move on to our next question.

Q?#2:  What are our guest's top three strategies for attorneys who want to embrace technology but don't know where to start?

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Question number two. Many lawyers feel overwhelmed by the rapid pace of technology change.

What are [00:18:00] your top three strategies for attorneys who want to embrace technology but don't know where to start?

Steve Fritzen: The thing I work with attorneys on quite often is a, identifying the gaps in mm-hmm. Productivity and then trying to figure out what the automation, what the delegation might be, the software that's gonna help alleviate the challenge.

But ultimately it's about starting small. You know, it's not about making a $25,000 investment investment in technology as a, as a. As a new solo to try to, you know, go hard and heavy from day one with no experience and whatever. So I think anything that you can sort of test the waters a bit and start to get comfortable, and I'll give you an example.

This is, this is not completely technology based, but you know, with social media and LinkedIn, like I'm helping lawyers post on LinkedIn and, and they're very uncomfortable with it. They don't know what to post, they don't know what to do, where to start. And I go, well, let's just, let's just figure it out.

What are the top five things that people come to you [00:19:00] and say, Hey, this is my problem. Alright, insurance, defense, personal injury, m and a, whatever the year is. Like, what are the top five things that you see and deal with every day? Then maybe go to chat, GPT or some AI and say, Hey, these are the top five things.

Help me create five posts that are engaging and that. Look, look me up, you know? And do you have any questions for me for before creating these posts, give it some good prompts. And now you've got five posts. So you're posting one a week for five weeks. The whole exercise took you 30 minutes, maybe less, and just start small.

One post a week. So I think whether it's posting, whether it's software, whether it's automation, my main tip is gonna be start small, start slow, get yourself comfortable. 'cause one thing you know about lawyers, and I know about lawyers is proof and evidence. Win the day and when you can get. When I buy the remarkable two and I start using it and start small using it for something and realize this is, I'm in love with this.

This is easy to use, this is not rocket [00:20:00] science. This is right up my alley. I start getting bought into it and then I start researching it, right? And then I start looking at what other things can this thing do for me? And now, and I'm still probably only using. 30% of its capabilities, for example. But I think that's the main thing is, is starting small and, and thinking about like what are the medial mundane elements of your day.

That administrative focused or marketing focused and, and you wanna be out hustling for business, right? You, we want you investing your time, working with clients and finding new clients. That's what every new solo should be thinking about. And all the, the, the minutia of the day like. Full inbox and all kinds of junk that you're dealing with.

That's where we need to, to look into technology to try to eliminate a lot of those headaches.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: So say, I think we got to start small. Use AI to assist. Third,

Steve Fritzen: third one, I would say consider a VA to help you get things off. Off and running more quickly. I think people are waiting too long to, because it [00:21:00] used to be you'd have to, you'd hire a full-time receptionist or you'd have a full-time, and then it's like, okay, no, I can, I can have a part-time person.

It's still a lot of money for a US-based $50 an hour assistant or whatever it might be. Right. And now in the Philippines and South America and South Africa, you know, it's on the low end, five an hour on the higher end, maybe 20. Mm-hmm. But if you hire someone for five in 10 hours a week. And they're getting that off your plate right away.

You're coming up with a list of administrative marketing, technology based tasks, and they're helping you get a Clio set up, helping you get your Gmail set up a certain way and a signature line. All the things that you need to get going, that's all gonna help you focus on, on building and growing the business.

Ad #2: Consider Buying The Tech-Savvy Lawyer a Cup of Coffee ☕️ or Two ☕️☕️!

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Pardon the interruption. I hope you're enjoying the Tech Savvy Layer page podcast. As much as I enjoy making them consider buying us a cup of coffee or two to help toray some of the production costs, thanks and enjoy.

I think I've gotta add a caveat here 'cause I have a US-based [00:22:00] VA who is, you know, to be blunt, not cheap compared to say the overseas VAs.

The concern of course is data security. Yeah. And what kind of treaties. Do the countries have with one another Because there could be an issue of data retention, of security of them being the other governments, possibly trying to gain access for one reason or another. And you've gotta make sure that you know where your pipeline, of where your data is going, where it's being stored.

Is it secure? Is it double and secured at your end and their end and Barrant and. Make sure that you look at your terms of service before you start, especially dealing with VAs from other countries. Yeah. That being said, you can also give the VAs, you know, in other countries more mundane routine stuff that don't deal with client.

PII.

Steve Fritzen: Yeah, I mean, background checks, reference checks. There's also a number of VA companies right now. I'm not gonna give out specific names, but there's a dozen VA companies that will help find and secure and [00:23:00] background check and manage the people. And again, you could have someone, I had a, an assistant when I first started my business.

Back in 2005. Four five, and she embezzled for me for six months and oh, tens of thousands of dollars behind our back and IFI figured it out. And she ended up doing 11 months, 12 months in Cook County jail. But I had a recourse, meaning the law here locally in the Chicagoland area to take right, you know, the camera footage of her at ATMs and, and at Target.

You know how she was, you know, using my credit card and all that. If somebody's in the Philippines or someone's down in Mexico, yeah, I think that would be quite challenging to, to get that back. So I think the other point might be maybe limit what access, right. Someone like that is getting from day one.

Yeah. As a way to kind of make sure you're not getting too deep in it without the proper security.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Well, Steve, let's look at our last question.

Q?#3:  What are the top three emerging technologies like AI and automation, reshaping the legal industry, and what are the top three steps lawyers should take now to prepare for these changes, both to improve their own practices and to better serve their clients?

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Question number three. Looking ahead, what are the top three emerging technologies like AI and automation, reshaping the legal industry, and what are the top three steps [00:24:00] lawyers should take now to prepare for these changes, both to improve their own practices and to better serve their clients?

Steve Fritzen: Top three, emerging technology, I mean. Legal, generally speaking, has been a slow moving train. I mean, tech, legal tech has been around for a while. Right. And lawyers are still very slow to change. They're very slow to adapt. Yeah. So it's hard. It's, there's more technology flying at their faces than they can mm-hmm.

Handle. And I interviewed John Morgan of Morgan and Morgan on my podcast for number five mm-hmm. Hundred. Okay. And I asked him about AI and is he gonna jump in ahead of everybody else? And his, I, his point was, no, I'm gonna hang back. I'm gonna let everybody else go with the hype and get involved in it, engaged in it, and, and make mistakes in it.

And I'm gonna be waiting in the wings and when things get kind of settled mm-hmm. That there's proof and evidence again, that things are working in a certain way and benefiting people in a certain way, then you know, I'll feel comfortable to jump in and start working through that. So that's where I'm seeing a lot of lawyers [00:25:00] mindsets right now.

Is they're waiting and seeing where I'm stepping in. And we talked about this a little pre-show was Right, right. You know, I wanna use, and I wanna help my clients use AI on a number of levels. Number one is like chat GT, as I mentioned earlier, for social media posts, right. I use chat GT with significant improvements in prompts to help take the transcripts of my podcast of all these interviews with rainmakers from around the world.

Mm-hmm. And say, Hey, can we pull the best tips and ideas and secrets that we were able to. Pull out of these interviews and create a book, and the answer is 101 Top. Rainmaker Secrets to Growing a Successful Law Practice. You know the book. So that was. In large part AI generated, so I can see lawyers who are thought leaders.

Mm-hmm. Um, really emerging with more content with books. Okay, yep. With audio, with now there's video creation. Like you, I've heard there's, I don't know what, maybe you know the, this one, but there's an AI where you can give it like a, a PowerPoint presentation and it turns it into a podcast. Right? Yeah.

Like, that's [00:26:00] so cool. Again, you know, I think things need to continue to be reviewed and edited. I've noticed that when you put things into Che GPT and you know that they're Che GD, because you, like I read one of my clients' posts or first time posting, and she sent it to me for edit, right? And I said, you know, you have nine N dashes in your small post.

And she's like, I didn't realize. I go, yeah. So let's pull those out because that's to some degree, uh. A chat GBT sort of giveaway. So I would say that's one is, is how we're using it for content creation.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Forgive the interruption. So I just started using notebook.ai to take my editorials that I come out with every Monday and turn it into a two person podcast episode discussing that.

And so if the busy professional who doesn't have time to read a blog post, they get to listen to a seven to 12 minute podcast automated talking about. The salient topics of that particular editorial.

Yeah.

And it's me having fun with it and I've been posting it on the podcast and I'm getting [00:27:00] some interesting feedback.

Steve Fritzen: Yeah. So I think that's one aspect of it. The second is, and, and again, you may get into specifics more than Me. Clearly AI is changing the game as it relates to the low level functions that associates and paralegals are doing. So, you know, a little bit concerned about their jobs. And my son's going off to college in the fall and I'm concerned like, all right, what are you getting into?

Is that job gonna exist in four years? Right? 'cause if you, if we had said, oh, I'm gonna become a coder, that job will never go away. I dunno about that. And so all of the eDiscovery and the document management and the letters, the order letters and all the different low level functions of things, of collecting data and, and putting out demand letters and all that stuff, that's all I think gonna be going away fairly soon.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Yeah. Wait, I think. There still need to be people who know how to do it. So whatever your son gets into, so for instance, if it's software co coding,

Steve Fritzen: yeah.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: People need to know how to do it because they need to be able to check and make sure that the code that the [00:28:00] AI is coming out with. Yeah, that the legal brief, that the AI is coming out with whatever analysis the AI is coming out with, that someone actually knows it's being done correctly.

Sometimes AI can't. So the job,

Steve Fritzen: but the job then is the AI being the AI coding expert that's gonna then run the ai that's gonna take the place of a thousand people that would be coding. So that job exists, right? So, and same thing with what I'm hearing again and again from people in legal is lawyers that.

Have an understanding of AI and how to leverage it for their firm, how to leverage it for their cases. Mm-hmm. Are gonna replace a lot of the people who don't know that, like the, the lawyers that are just doing the work aren't gonna be as valuable as the ones who can do the work. And by the way, also know how to drive the AI function

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: well.

This is a common conversation I have with a variety of attorneys. And what we've all come up with is that lawyers who do not know how to use AI will be left behind by those who do.

Steve Fritzen: Yeah. I mean, [00:29:00] that's what I'm hearing as well. And so again, you know, is it a concern for me? No. I mean, it's not a concern for me.

It's a concern for. The legal community, right. I think to some degree because like college grads are, are struggling to get jobs right now and that, I don't know that that's gonna be easier in the next year or two. There's a lot of the jobs slowly disappear and even first year, like what's a first year law student gonna work on?

It used to be certain things that are now gonna be done by ai. So now how do we elevate them, you know, faster to learn the law and work on trial stuff and work on maybe second, third, fourth year stuff the first year. That might be interesting. So that's number two. And then number three. Is, I think it's, it's around the software, the legal tech that's coming out that's really helping people better manage relationships.

For example, Matics, they've got, mm-hmm. You know, AI and not, not ai. They've got legal tech capabilities where a lot of my clients struggle with how do I keep in touch with my clients? How do I keep in touch with my network? How am I adding value for them? Right, and they're, they're doing it manually, [00:30:00] right?

Like, oh, I gotta find this person's name, and I gotta reach out to them and, and set up a meeting, a coffee. And so, like, I'm using Matic as an example where I've got all of my network, past clients, existing clients, networks, strategic partners, podcast guests, all these people into categories where I can just say, all right, I want, I've got an event coming up in two weeks.

I wanna send this group, this group, and this group all in e what looks like an individual email about this event. And that's all managed and it can all be automated. So that's the kind of stuff that I think. In, in LinkedIn and LinkedIn, automations continue to be developed. Mm-hmm. And how people are hoing the internet to find that one of their GC clients just got promoted to another position or role.

Right, right. And automatically creates the congratulations email and brings in the fact that they've got three kids and two are twins and all that jazz, and then they hit send or it sends automatically or whatever the approval process is. I mean, that's all happening soon. It's happening [00:31:00] now in some cases.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Excellent. Steve, I want to thank you for sharing all that. Please tell us where people can find you.

Where you can find out Guest!

Steve Fritzen: Yeah, so you can go to be that lawyer.com to find my website to learn more about what I do for lawyers. I'm really in the business development, coaching and training function and all the, you know, the side perks of, of technology and automation.

Right. Kind of like, you know, icing on the cake if you will, but I'm teaching sales free selling, which is, you know, every lawyer hates. I'm sure you hate sales and hates selling and being sold to. I'm right there with everybody. That's why I. Created a program and a process that's anti sales, and I'm all over LinkedIn.

I, I'm posting multiple times a day and I would love to, to connect with people on LinkedIn if they've got questions about, you know, whether it's business development and legal and tech, or whether it's, you know, anything. I'm happy to be a resource,

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: but wait, because I see it in the background, you've gotta do a pitch for your book.

Steve Fritzen: Oh, okay. Yeah. So be that lawyer. 101 Top Rainmaker Secrets to Growing a successful Law Practice. It's 55 star reviews on Amazon. It's 101 rainmakers that I've [00:32:00] interviewed. All of their top secrets and best practices, how to live the best lawyer's life. Build a practice you can be proud of. Marketing. It covers like seven major areas that lawyers need to know in order to, to build a practice.

They can be really happy whether you're at a big firm or you're a solo. This book is, is the one to, to get. And I wish I could tell you I wrote it, but I used ai. The interviews were, was the writing is in the interviews I conducted. Right, right. But I just love that I was able to, to work with AI to create such an amazing tool.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Alright, so that being said, I think there's one more thing you need to share with the audience.

Steve Fritzen: Okay.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Your podcast,

Steve Fritzen: podcast also by the name be That Lawyer, 510 episodes, and it's really everything lawyers need to know about how to be that lawyer, confident, organized, in a skilled rainmaker. So I'm bringing on rainmakers.

Top legal experts in areas. You know, Michael, if we, if we don't get it, keep it quite as nerdy as I think you like to be about Apple. Like someone that can talk about what the top five [00:33:00] best legal tech tools are, the newest tech tools. Like that kind of information that's in the moment is super helpful to my audience.

So we'll have to talk about that once we get off. But the idea is that it's really a podcast that, that covers a lot of ground for, for everyone in law that is interested in growth. If you're, if you just want to crank out billable hours. Not the show for you, right? If you have ambitions for more in your life to live the best lawyer's life and free wealth for your family and have real satisfaction in a career, this is the show.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Excellent. I'll be sure to have all that in the show notes and more. Steve, thanks again. Thank you, Michael.

See You in Two Weeks!

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Thank you for joining me on this episode of the Tech Savvy Lawyer Page podcast. Our next episode will be posted in about two weeks. If you have any ideas about a future episode, please contact me at Michael DJ at the Tech Savvy Lawyer page.

Have a great day and happy [00:34:00] Lawyering.

It's Happening This Saturday! Tech-Savvy Saturday Goes Live at 12 PM EST! 🎉💻

The wait is over! This Saturday, August 30, 2025 at 12:00 PM EST, we're finally presenting "Preparing Your Old Office Technology for Your Kids' Back-to-School Success" – and it's going to be incredible! 🚀

As your award-winning host at The Tech-Savvy Lawyer.Page, I've crafted a comprehensive, action-packed session that transforms the way legal professionals approach family technology. This isn't just about repurposing equipment – it's about creating secure, efficient learning environments while maintaining the ethical standards our profession demands.

What makes this session extraordinary:

  • Step-by-step device sanitization protocols specifically designed for legal professionals.

  • Family cybersecurity strategies that protect both your practice and your children.

  • Attorney-client privilege protection during device transitions.

Your patience has been rewarded with enhanced content, deeper insights, and practical solutions you won't find anywhere else. Join hundreds of legal professionals who are already registered for what promises to be our most valuable session yet!

You can Register Here for free!

Mark your calendar: Saturday, August 30, 2025 at 12:00 PM EST

See you there! 🌟