🎙️ Ep. 122: Cybersecurity Essentials for Law Firms: Proven Strategies from Navy Veteran & Attorney Cordell Robinson

My next guest is Cordell Brion Robinson, CEO of Brownstone Consulting Firm and a decorated US Navy veteran who brings an extraordinary combination of expertise to cybersecurity. With a background in Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, and law, plus experience as a Senior Intelligence Analyst, Cordell has created cybersecurity programs that comply with the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the Federal Information Security Management Act, and the Office of Management and Budget standards for both government and commercial organizations. His firm specializes in compliance services, performing security framework assessments globally for commercial and government entities. Currently, he's innovating the cybersecurity space through automation for security assessments. Beyond his professional accomplishments, Cordell runs the Shaping Futures Foundation, a nonprofit dedicated to empowering youth through education, demonstrating his commitment to giving back to the community.

Join Cordell Robinson and me as we discuss the following three questions and more! 🎙️

1. What are the top three cybersecurity practices that lawyers should immediately adopt to secure both client data and sensitive case material in their practice?

2. From your perspective as both a legal and cybersecurity expert, what are the top three technology tools or platforms that can help lawyers streamline compliance and governance requirements in a rapidly evolving regulatory environment?

3. What are the top three steps lawyers can take to overcome resistance to technology adoption in law firms, ensuring these tools actually improve outcomes and efficiency rather than just adding complexity

In our conversation, we cover the following: ⏱️

- 00:00:00 - Introduction and welcome to the podcast

- 00:00:30 - Cordell's current tech setup - Windows laptop, MacBook, and iPhone

- 00:01:00 - iPhone 17 Pro Max features including 48MP camera, 2TB storage, and advanced video capture

- 00:01:30 - iPhone 17 Air comparison and laptop webcam discussion

- 00:02:00 - VPN usage strategies - Government VPN for secure client communications

- 00:02:30 - Commercial client communications and secure file sharing practices

- 00:03:00 - Why email encryption matters and Mac Mail setup tutorial

- 00:04:00 - Bonus question: Key differences between commercial and government security work

- 00:05:00 - Security protocols comparison and navigating government red tape

- 00:06:00 - Question 1: Top three cybersecurity practices lawyers must implement immediately

- 00:06:30 - Understanding where client data comes from and having proper IT security professionals

- 00:07:00 - Implementing cybersecurity awareness training for all staff members

- 00:07:30 - Practical advice for solo and small practitioners without dedicated IT staff

- 00:08:00 - Proper email practices and essential security awareness training skills

- 00:08:30 - Handling data from average clients in sensitive cases like family law

- 00:09:00 - Social engineering considerations in contentious legal matters such as divorces

- 00:10:00 - Screening threats from seemingly reliable platforms - Google Play slop ads as recent example

- 00:10:30 - Tenable vulnerability scanning tool recommendation (approximately $1,500/year)

- 00:11:00 - Question 2: Technology tools for streamlining compliance and governance

- 00:11:30 - GRC tools for organizing compliance documentation across various price points

- 00:12:00 - SharePoint security lockdown and importance of proper system configuration

- 00:12:30 - Monitoring tools discussion - why no perfect solution exists and what to consider

- 00:13:00 - Being amenable to change and avoiding long-term contracts with security tools

- 00:14:00 - Question 3: Strategies for overcoming resistance to technology adoption

- 00:14:30 - Demonstrating efficiency and explaining the full implementation process

- 00:15:00 - Converting time savings to dollars and cents for senior attorney buy-in

- 00:15:30 - Mindset shift for billable hour attorneys and staying competitive in the market

- 00:16:00 - Being a technology Guinea pig and testing tools yourself first

- 00:16:30 - Showing real results to encourage buy-in from colleagues

- 00:17:00 - Real-world Microsoft Word example - styles, cross-references, and table of contents time savings

- 00:17:30 - Showing value add and how technology can bring in more revenue

- 00:18:00 - Where to find Cordell Robinson - LinkedIn, www.bcf-us.com, Brownstone Consulting Firm

- 00:18:30 - Company description and closing remarks

Resources 📚

Connect with Cordell Robinson:

Government & Compliance Frameworks:

Software & Tools:

🎙️ Ep. 120: AI Game Changers for Law Firms - Stephen Embry on Legal Tech Adoption and Privacy Concerns 🤖⚖️

My next guest is Stephen Embry. Steve is a legal technology expert, blogger at Tech Law Crossroads, and contributor to Above the Law. A former mass tort defense litigator with 20 years of remote practice experience, Steven specializes in AI implementation for law firms and legal technology adoption challenges. With a master's degree in civil engineering and programming expertise since 1980, he brings a unique technical insight to legal practice. Steven provides data-driven analysis on how AI is revolutionizing law firms while addressing critical privacy and security concerns for legal professionals. 💻

Join Stephen Embry and me as we discuss the following three questions and more! 🎯

  1. What do you think are the top three game-changer announcements from the 2025 ILTA Conference for AI that're gonna make the most impact for solo, small, and mid-size law firms?

  2. What are the top three security and privacy concerns lawyers should address when using AI?

  3. What are your top three hacks when it comes to using AI in legal?

In our conversation, we covered the following and more! 📝

  • [00:00:00] Episode Introduction & Guest Bio

  • [00:01:00] Steve's Current Tech Setup

  • [00:02:00] Apple Devices Discussion - MacBook Air M4, AirPods Pro

  • [00:06:00] Android Phone & Remote Practice Experience

  • [00:09:00] iPad Collection & MacBook Air Purchase Story

  • [00:12:00] Travel Tech & Backup Strategies

  • [00:15:00] Q1: AI Game Changers from ILTA 2025 Conference

  • [00:24:00] Billable Hour vs AI Adoption Challenges

  • [00:26:00] Competition & Client Demands for Technology

  • [00:35:00] Q2: AI Security & Privacy Concerns for Lawyers

  • [00:37:00] Discoverability & Privilege Waiver Issues

  • [00:44:00] Q3: Top AI Hacks for Legal Professionals

  • [00:46:00] Using AI for Document Construction & Rules Compliance

  • [00:50:00] Contact Information & Resources

Resources 📚

Connect with Stephen Embry

• Email: sembry@techlawcrossroads.com
• Blog: Tech Law Crossroads - https://techlawcrossroads.com
• Above the Law Contributions: https://abovethelaw.com
• LinkedIn: [Stephen Embry LinkedIn Profile]

Mentioned in the Episode

• ILTA (International Lawyers Technology Association) Conference 2025 - https://www.iltanet.org
• Max Stock Conference - Chicago area legal technology conference
• Consumer Electronics Show (CES) - https://www.ces.tech
• Federal Rules of Civil Procedure - https://www.uscourts.gov/rules-policies/current-rules/federal-rules-civil-procedure
• Apple Event (October 9th) - Apple's product announcement events
• Gaylord Conference Center - Washington, DC area conference venue

Hardware Mentioned in the Conversation 🖥️

• MacBook Air M4 (13-inch) - https://www.apple.com/macbook-air/
• iPad Pro - https://www.apple.com/ipad-pro/
• iPad Air - https://www.apple.com/ipad-air/
• iPad Mini - https://www.apple.com/ipad-mini/
• iPhone 16 - https://www.apple.com/iphone-16/
• Apple Watch Ultra 2 - https://www.apple.com/apple-watch-ultra-2/
• AirPods Pro - https://www.apple.com/airpods-pro/
• Samsung Galaxy (Android phone) - https://www.samsung.com/us/mobile/phones/galaxy/
• Samsung Galaxy Fold 7 - https://www.samsung.com/global/galaxy/galaxy-z-fold7/

Software & Cloud Services Mentioned in the Conversation ☁️

• Apple Intelligence - https://www.apple.com/apple-intelligence/
• ChatGPT - https://chat.openai.com
• Claude (Anthropic) - https://claude.ai
• Brock AI - AI debate and argumentation tool
• Notebook AI - https://notebooklm.google.com
• Microsoft Word - https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/word
• Dropbox - https://www.dropbox.com
• Backblaze - https://www.backblaze.com
• Synology - https://www.synology.com
• Whisper AI - https://openai.com/research/whisper

Don't forget to give The Tech-Savvy Lawyer.Page Podcast a Five-Star ⭐️ review on Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcast feeds! Your support helps us continue bringing you expert insights on legal technology.

Our next episode will be posted in about two weeks. If you have any ideas about a future episode, please contact Michael at michaeldj@techsavvylawyer.page 📧

🚀 Shout Out to Steve Embry: A Legal Tech Visionary Tackling AI's Billing Revolution!

Legal technology expert Steve Embry has once again hit the mark with his provocative and insightful article examining the collision between AI adoption and billable hour pressures in law firms. Writing for TechLaw Crossroads, Steve masterfully dissects the DeepL survey findings that reveal 96% of legal professionals are using AI tools, with 71% doing so without organizational approval. His analysis illuminates a critical truth that many in the profession are reluctant to acknowledge: the billable hour model is facing its most serious existential threat yet.

The AI Efficiency Paradox in Legal Practice ⚖️

Steve’s article brilliantly connects the dots between mounting billable hour pressures and the rise of shadow AI use in legal organizations. The DeepL study reveals that 35% of legal professionals frequently use unauthorized AI tools, primarily driven by pressure to deliver work faster. This finding aligns perfectly with research showing that AI-driven efficiencies are forcing law firms to reconsider traditional billing models. When associates can draft contracts 70% faster with AI assistance, the fundamental economics of legal work shift dramatically.

The legal profession finds itself caught in what experts call the "AI efficiency paradox". As generative AI tools become more sophisticated at automating legal research, document drafting, and analysis, the justification for billing clients based purely on time spent becomes increasingly problematic. This creates a perfect storm when combined with the intense pressure many firms place on associates to meet billable hour quotas - some firms now demanding 2,400 hours annually, with 2,000 being billable and collectible.

Shadow AI Use: A Symptom of Systemic Pressure 🔍

Steve's analysis goes beyond surface-level criticism to examine the root causes of unauthorized AI adoption. The DeepL survey data shows that unclear policies account for only 24% of shadow AI use, while pressure to deliver faster work represents 35% of the motivation. This finding supports Steve's central thesis that "the responsibility for hallucinations and inaccuracies is not just that of the lawyer. It's that of senior partners and clients who expect and demand AI use. They must recognize their accountability in creating demands and pressures to not do the time-consuming work to check cites".

This systemic pressure has created a dangerous environment where junior lawyers face impossible choices. They must choose between taking unbillable time to thoroughly verify AI outputs or risk submitting work with potential hallucinations to meet billing targets. Recent data shows that AI hallucinations have appeared in over 120 legal cases since mid-2023, with 58 occurring in 2025 alone. The financial consequences are real - one firm faced $31,100 in sanctions for relying on bogus AI research.

The Billable Hour's Reckoning 💰

How will lawyers handle the challenge to the billable hour with AI use in their practice of law?

Multiple industry observers now predict that AI adoption will accelerate the demise of traditional hourly billing. Research indicates that 67% of corporate legal departments and 55% of law firms expect AI-driven efficiencies to impact the prevalence of the billable hour significantly. The legal profession is witnessing a fundamental shift where "[t]he less time something takes, the more money a firm can earn" once alternative billing methods are adopted.

Forward-thinking firms are already adapting by implementing hybrid billing models that combine hourly rates for complex judgment calls with flat fees for AI-enhanced routine tasks. This transition requires firms to develop what experts call "AI-informed Alternative Fee Arrangements" that embed clear automation metrics into legal pricing.

The Path Forward: Embracing Responsible AI Integration 🎯

Steve’s article serves as a crucial wake-up call for legal organizations to move beyond sanctions-focused approaches toward comprehensive AI integration strategies. The solution requires acknowledgment from senior partners and clients that AI adoption must include adequate time for verification and quality control processes. This too should serve as a reminder for any attorney, big firm to solo, to check their work before submitting it to a court, regulatory agency, etc. Several state bars and courts have begun requiring certification that AI-generated content has been reviewed for accuracy, recognizing that oversight cannot be an afterthought.

The most successful firms will be those that embrace AI while building robust verification protocols into their workflows. This means training lawyers to use AI competently, establishing clear policies for AI use, and most importantly, ensuring billing practices reflect the true value delivered rather than simply time spent. As one expert noted, "AI isn't the problem, poor process is".

Final Thoughts: Technology Strategy for Modern Legal Practice 📱

Are you ready to take your law practice to the next step with AI?

For legal professionals with limited to moderate technology skills, the key is starting with purpose-built legal AI tools rather than general-purpose solutions. Specialized legal research platforms that include retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) technology can significantly reduce hallucination risks while providing the efficiency gains clients expect. These tools ground AI responses in verified legal databases, offering the speed benefits of AI with enhanced accuracy.

The profession must also recognize that competent AI use requires ongoing education. Lawyers need not become AI experts, but they must develop "a reasonable understanding of the capabilities and limitations of the specific GAI technology" they employ. This includes understanding when human judgment must predominate and how to effectively verify AI-generated content.

Steve's insightful analysis reminds us that the legal profession's AI revolution cannot be solved through individual blame or simplistic rules. Instead, it requires systemic changes that address the underlying pressures driving risky AI use while embracing the transformative potential of these technologies. The firms that succeed will be those that view AI not as a threat to traditional billing but as an opportunity to deliver greater value to clients while building more sustainable and satisfying practices for their legal professionals. 🌟

ILTACON 2025 Attendance Forces Postponement of Exciting TSS - Preparing Old Office Tech for Your Kids' Back-to-School Success 📚💻

Dear Tech-Savvy Saturday Community,

Due to my attendance at ILTACON 2025 (August 10-14, 2025) at the Gaylord National Harbor Convention Center this week, this month's Tech-Savvy Saturday session originally scheduled for August 16 has been postponed until Saturday, August 23, 2025 at 12 PM EST 🕐.

This postponement presents the perfect opportunity to dive deeper into our upcoming topic: "Preparing Your Old Office Technology for Your Kids' Back-to-School Success." As legal professionals, we often have reliable office equipment that could serve our children well as they return to school. This session will explore practical strategies for repurposing scanners, laptops, printers, and other office technology to create productive learning environments at home.

Our session will cover device preparation techniques, security considerations for family use, and creative ways to transform professional equipment into educational tools. We'll discuss how to properly clean and configure devices, implement age-appropriate restrictions, and ensure data security when transitioning office equipment to personal.

Stay tuned and mark your calendars for Saturday, August 23, 2025 as we explore this practical intersection of legal technology and family needs 📅✨.

Have a Great Weekend and Stay Tech-Savvy!

ILTACON 2025 Opening: Navigating the Legal Tech Treasure Trove ⚓

Get your legal tech plunder at #ILTACON2025

Ahoy, legal tech voyagers! ⛵ ILTACON 2025 has officially set sail at the magnificent Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center in National Harbor, Maryland, and what a spectacular opening it's been. From August 10-14, over 4,000 legal professionals interested in legal technology are charting their course through the most comprehensive bounty of legal tech innovations ever assembled.

This year's pirate theme couldn't be more fitting. Legal professionals have truly become modern-day treasure hunters, seeking out the digital gold that will transform their practices. The opening reception on Monday morning perfectly captured this spirit, with maritime merriment setting the tone for what promises to be an extraordinary week of discovery.

Among the distinguished crew of attendees, we spotted previous podcast guest Stephen Embry, the brilliant mind behind the TechLaw Crossroads blog and former chair of the American Bar Association’s Law Practice Division. His insights on artificial intelligence adoption and legal technology competency continue to guide practitioners navigating the choppy waters of digital transformation. Also making waves is Brett Burney, Vice President of NextPoint Law Group, whose expertise in bridging the chasm between legal and technology frontiers has made him a sought-after guide for firms embracing Discovery solutions.

The exhibit hall, themed as the "Pirate's Bounty," features over 225 vendors displaying their technological treasures. From AI-powered legal research tools to advanced case management systems, the bounty available to legal professionals has never been more abundant. The challenge isn't finding technology—it's selecting the right tools that will genuinely enhance practice efficiency without overwhelming existing workflows.

What makes ILTACON unique is its peer-driven approach to education. Unlike vendor-heavy conferences, ILTACON sessions are crafted by practitioners who have firsthand experience with the challenges facing legal technology professionals. This year's 80+ educational sessions span eight focus areas, ensuring every legal professional finds relevant insights to take back to their firm.

For firms with limited to moderate technology skills, ILTACON provides the perfect environment to learn from peers who have successfully navigated similar challenges. The networking opportunities alone justify the investment, as connections made here often lead to solutions for specific practice challenges.

The pirate theme extends beyond mere decoration—it represents the adventurous spirit required to succeed in today's legal technology landscape. Legal professionals must be willing to explore uncharted territories, test new solutions, and occasionally take calculated risks to discover the innovations that will give their practices a competitive edge.

#ILTACON2025

As we sail through this week of discovery, remember that the real treasure isn't the technology itself—it's the enhanced client service, improved efficiency, and competitive advantages these tools provide when properly implemented.

May fair winds fill your sails as you navigate this legal tech treasure trove! ⚓

#ILTACON2025

🎙️ Ep. 117: Legal Tech Revolution,  How Dorna Moini Built Gavel.ai to Transform the Practice of Law with AI and Automation.

Dorna Moini, CEO and Founder of Gavel, discusses how generative AI is transforming the way legal professionals work. She explains how Gavel helps lawyers automate their work, save time, and reach more clients without needing to know how to code. In the conversation, she shares the top three ways AI has improved Gavel's tools and operations. She also highlights the most significant security risks that lawyers should be aware of when using AI tools. Lastly, she provides simple tips to ensure AI-generated results are accurate and reliable, as well as how to avoid false or misleading information.

Join Dorna and me as we discuss the following three questions and more!

  1. What are the top three ways generative AI has transferred Gavel's offerings and operations?

  2. What are the top three most critical security concerns legal professionals should be aware of when using AI-integrated products like Gavel?

  3. What are the top three ways to ensure the accuracy and reliability of AI-generated results, including measures to prevent false or misleading information or hallucinations?

In our conversation, we cover the following:

[01:16] Dorna's Tech Setup and Upgrades

[03:56] Discussion on Computer and Smartphone Upgrades

[08:31] Exploring Additional Tech and Sleeping Technology

[09:32] Generative AI's Impact on Gavel's Operations

[13:13] Critical Security Concerns in AI-Integrated Products

[16:44] Playbooks and Redline Capabilities in Gavel Exec

[20:45] Contact Information

Resources

Connect with Dorna:

Websites & SaaS Products:

  • Apple Podcasts — Podcast platform (for reviews)

  • Apple Podcasts — Podcast platform (for reviews)

  • ChatGPT — AI conversational assistant by OpenAI

  • ChatGPT — AI conversational assistant by OpenAI

  • Gavel — AI-powered legal automation platform (formerly Documate)

  • Gavel Exec — AI assistant for legal document review and redlining (part of Gavel)

  • MacRumors — Apple news and product cycle information

  • MacRumors — Apple news and product cycle information

  • Notion — Workspace for notes, databases, and project management

  • Notion — Workspace for notes, databases, and project management

  • Slack — Team communication and collaboration platform 

Hardware:

Other:

🎙️ Ep. #115: Legal Technology Mastery with Law Librarian Jennifer Wondracek – Essential AI Tools and Skills for Modern Lawyers.

Our next guest is Jennifer Wondracek, Director of the Law Library and Professor of Legal Research and Writing at Capital University Law School. Jennifer shares her expertise as a legal technologist and ABA Women of Legal Tech Honoree. She addresses three vital questions: the top technological tools law students and lawyers should leverage, strategies to help new attorneys adapt to firm technologies, and ways law firms can automate routine tasks to prioritize high-value legal work. Drawing on her extensive experience in legal education and technology, Jennifer emphasizes practical solutions, the importance of transferable skills, and the increasing role of generative AI in modern legal practice.

Join Jennifer and me as we discuss the following three questions and more!

  1. As Head Librarian at Capital University Law School, what are the top three technological tools or resources that you believe law students and practicing lawyers should be leveraging right now to enhance legal research and client service?

  2. What are the top three strategies that lawyers can use to help law students clerking for a firm, or new attorneys, quickly adapt to become proficient with the technology platforms and tools used in their practice, particularly when these tools differ from what they learned in law school?

  3. Beyond legal research, what are the top three ways law firms and solo practitioners can use technology to automate routine tasks and create more time for high-value legal work?

In our conversation, we cover the following:

[01:03] Jennifer’s Current Tech Setup

[06:27] Top Technological Tools for Law Students and Practicing Lawyers

[11:23] Case Management Systems and Generative AI

[23:15] Strategies for Law Students and New Attorneys to Adapt to Technology

[31:03] Permissions and Backup Practices

[34:20] Automating Routine Tasks with Technology

[39:41] Favorite Non-Legal AI Tools

Resources:

Connect with Jennifer:

Mentioned in the episode:

Hardware mentioned in the conversation:

Software & Cloud Services mentioned in the conversation:

How To 🛠️: Choosing the Right USB-C & Thunderbolt Cables for Legal Professionals - Understanding Speed, Power, & Professional Requirements in 2025 ⚡

lawyers need to know what cables they are using in their tech work.

In today's technology-driven legal landscape, the cables connecting your devices matter more than you might realize. The Universal Serial Bus Type-C (USB-C) standard has become the dominant connection type for modern professional equipment, but the introduction of Thunderbolt 3, 4, and 5 technologies has created a complex ecosystem of capabilities that many legal professionals don't fully understand. These distinctions can impact everything from your laptop's charging efficiency to the speed at which you transfer critical case files, making cable selection a crucial professional decision.

Why Cable Selection Matters for Legal Practice 🏛️

Modern law firms increasingly rely on portable technology to maintain productivity across multiple locations. USB-C cables and Thunderbolt connections serve as the critical link between your devices, enabling power delivery, data transfer, and video output through a single connection . The European Union's recent mandate requiring USB-C as the universal charging standard demonstrates the connector's importance in professional environments.

The legal profession's unique requirements demand reliable, high-performance connections. Depositions recorded on tablets need swift transfer to desktop workstations. Court presentations require dependable connections between laptops and projection systems. Client meetings conducted remotely depend on stable power delivery to prevent device failures during critical discussions.

Poor-quality cables may deliver inconsistent power, cause data corruption, or even present fire hazards.

🚨

Poor-quality cables may deliver inconsistent power, cause data corruption, or even present fire hazards. 🚨

Understanding USB-C and Thunderbolt Cable Categories 🔌

USB-C cables fall into several categories, each serving distinct professional needs. Standard USB-C cables provide basic connectivity with varying data transfer speeds from USB 2.0 (480 Mbps) to USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20 Gbps). These cables excel in basic office environments where attorneys need simple device charging and document transfer capabilities.

Thunderbolt technology represents a significant advancement over standard USB-C connections . Thunderbolt 3 and 4 cables support up to 40 Gbps data transfer speeds while maintaining backward compatibility with USB-C devices. Thunderbolt 5, the latest generation, doubles this performance to 80 Gbps bidirectional bandwidth, with Bandwidth Boost capability reaching 120 Gbps for display-intensive applications.

Full-featured Thunderbolt cables provide comprehensive functionality, supporting data transfer, video output, and power delivery simultaneously. These cables excel in modern law office environments where attorneys need to connect laptops to external monitors while simultaneously charging devices and transferring large files.

Thunderbolt Technology Evolution and Legal Applications ⚙️

Thunderbolt 4 cables are probably good enough for lawyers who deal mostly with text and one additional monitor.

Thunderbolt 4 established mandatory minimum requirements that ensure consistent performance across all certified devices. Unlike USB-C standards where many features remain optional, Thunderbolt 4 requires 40 Gbps data transfer speeds, support for two 4K displays or one 8K display, and PCIe bandwidth (data transfer capacity per lane measured in gigabytes) of 32 Gbps. This consistency proves valuable for legal professionals who need reliable performance across different office locations and court systems.

Thunderbolt 5 represents the next generation of professional connectivity, offering 80 Gbps bidirectional bandwidth with Bandwidth Boost capability up to 120 Gbps. This technology supports dual 6K displays, PCIe Gen 4 data throughput at 64 Gbps, and power delivery up to 240 watts. Legal professionals working with video evidence, virtual reality presentations, or large-scale document productions benefit significantly from these enhanced capabilities.

The Bandwidth Boost feature in Thunderbolt 5 dynamically allocates bandwidth based on demand, providing up to 120 Gbps in one direction while maintaining 40 Gbps for the return path. This asymmetric allocation proves particularly valuable for attorneys conducting video depositions or presenting multimedia evidence in court settings.

Power Delivery Standards and Legal Practice Applications

USB-C Power Delivery specifications directly impact your device's charging capabilities and overall reliability. Standard USB-C cables support up to 100 watts of power delivery, adequate for smartphones, tablets, and many ultrabooks (premium, lightweight laptop computers) used in legal practice. However, high-performance laptops commonly used for legal research and document preparation often require higher power delivery capabilities.

Thunderbolt 4 requires support for up to 100 watts of power delivery, with availability up to 140 watts for compatible devices. Thunderbolt 5 extends this capability significantly, requiring up to 140 watts with availability up to 240 watts of power delivery. This enhanced power capability proves particularly valuable for legal professionals who rely on high-performance laptops for complex tasks such as large document review, video depositions, or presentations requiring substantial processing power.

Professional legal work often involves extended periods away from traditional power source. Courts, client offices, and temporary workspaces may offer limited charging opportunities. Cables supporting higher power delivery can significantly reduce charging time, ensuring devices remain operational during critical professional activities.

Data Transfer Speed Requirements for Legal Workflows 📈

Data transfer speeds become crucial when legal professionals handle large files common in modern practice. Video depositions, high-resolution evidence photographs, and comprehensive case documentation can consume substantial storage space and require efficient transfer capabilities.

USB 2.0 speeds (480 Mbps) handle basic document transfer adequately but struggle with multimedia files. USB 3.2 Gen 2 provides 10 Gbps transfer speeds, offering noticeable improvements for larger file handling. Thunderbolt 3 and 4 deliver 40 Gbps, while Thunderbolt 5 achieves up to 80 Gbps with Bandwidth Boost reaching 120 Gbps.

Legal professionals working with video evidence, virtual reality presentations, or large-scale document productions benefit significantly from higher-speed cables. The time savings compound when transferring multiple gigabytes of case materials between devices or to external storage systems.

Thunderbolt vs USB4 v2: Understanding Professional Differences 🔄

Thunderbolt 5 cables are good for lawyers who rely on video and/or large data files.

Thunderbolt 5 and USB4 v2 share similar underlying technology but differ significantly in implementation requirements. USB4 v2 specifications make many advanced features optional, with only 20 Gbps guaranteed and 80 Gbps as an optional capability. Thunderbolt 5, conversely, mandates 80 Gbps as the minimum requirement with 140 watts power delivery required.

This distinction proves critical for legal professionals who need consistent performance across different devices and locations. Thunderbolt certification ensures that every cable and device meets strict performance standards, while USB4 v2 devices may vary significantly in actual capabilities.

The mandatory certification process for Thunderbolt products provides additional assurance for professional environments. Legal professionals investing in Thunderbolt-certified equipment can expect reliable performance regardless of manufacturer or specific implementation.

Safety and Compliance Considerations 🛡️

Professional legal practice demands attention to safety standards and equipment reliability. USB-C cables carrying more than 60 watts require Electronic Marker (E-Marker) chips to communicate power requirements safely. These chips prevent dangerous power delivery mismatches that could damage expensive professional equipment.

The USB Implementers Forum (USB-IF) and Intel provide certification programs ensuring cable compliance with safety standards. Certified cables display appropriate logos and markings, providing assurance of proper manufacturing and testing. Legal professionals should prioritize certified cables to protect valuable equipment and maintain reliable operations.

Counterfeit or substandard cables pose significant risks in professional environments. Poor-quality cables may deliver inconsistent power, cause data corruption, or even present fire hazards. The potential consequences of equipment failure during critical legal proceedings justify investing in properly certified cables.

Practical Selection Guidelines for Legal Professionals 💼

Assess your specific professional requirements before selecting cables. Attorneys primarily using tablets and smartphones for basic tasks may find standard USB-C cables with 60-watt power delivery sufficient. However, professionals relying on high-performance laptops for complex legal software should consider Thunderbolt 4 or 5 cables supporting higher power delivery and data transfer speeds.

Consider your typical work environments and usage patterns. Mobile attorneys who frequently work in various locations benefit from durable, flexible cables that withstand regular handling. Office-based professionals may prioritize longer cables for permanent desk setups or conference room installations.

Evaluate your data transfer needs based on file types and sizes commonly handled in your practice. Personal injury attorneys working with extensive medical records and accident reconstruction videos require different capabilities than corporate attorneys primarily handling text-based contracts.

Selecting cables that support current and emerging standards ensures continued compatibility as your technology needs evolve.

💡

Selecting cables that support current and emerging standards ensures continued compatibility as your technology needs evolve. 💡

Cable Length and Performance Considerations 📏

Thunderbolt 5 passive cables support full performance up to 1 meter in length, with specialized implementations available in 0.3, 0.5, 0.8, and 1-meter lengths. Beyond 1 meter, active cables with built-in electronics become necessary to maintain signal integrity over longer distances.

Thunderbolt 4 cables under 1 meter can support Thunderbolt 5 data rates, providing some forward compatibility for existing installations. This backward compatibility proves valuable for legal professionals upgrading their technology infrastructure gradually.

Professional legal environments often require longer cable runs for conference rooms or courtroom presentations. You will need Active Thunderbolt cables to maintain performance over distances up to 2 meters. This will enable flexible installation options for permanent and temporary setups.

Future-Proofing Your Cable Investment 🚀

The legal technology landscape continues evolving rapidly. Thunderbolt 5 adoption is accelerating, and 240-watt power delivery is becoming more common in professional devices. Selecting cables that support current and emerging standards ensures continued compatibility as your technology needs evolve.

Professional legal practice increasingly relies on sophisticated technology for case management, client communication, and court presentations. Investing in appropriate Thunderbolt cables from reliable and admittedly more expensive providers represents a small but crucial component of maintaining technological competency in modern legal practice.

The continued development of artificial intelligence tools and high-resolution display technologies in legal applications will demand higher bandwidth and power delivery capabilities. Legal professionals who understand these evolving standards position themselves advantageously as technology continues advancing.

📊 USB-C & Thunderbolt Cable Comparison Table

Final Roundup 📋

USB-C and Thunderbolt cable selection directly impacts professional efficiency and equipment reliability in modern legal practice. Understanding power delivery requirements, data transfer speeds, safety standards, and the distinctions between USB-C, Thunderbolt 4, and Thunderbolt 5 enables informed decisions that support your professional objectives. As legal technology continues advancing, professionals who master these fundamental concepts will maintain competitive advantages in increasingly technology-dependent practice environments.

MTC: Law Firm Technology Procurement Strategy During Trade Court Tariff Chaos: Buy Now or Wait?

Tariff chaos continues with recent ruling by US Court of International trade creating confusion for lawyers on how to address their office tech needs!

The recent ruling by the US Court of International Trade has thrown technology procurement strategies for law firms into unprecedented uncertainty. Legal practitioners nationwide face a critical decision that could significantly impact their operational costs and technological capabilities for years to come.

On May 28, 2025, a three-judge panel at the US Court of International Trade delivered a landmark decision that struck down President Trump's sweeping tariff regime, ruling that the administration exceeded its constitutional authority by implementing global import duties under emergency powers legislation. The court determined that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not grant the president unlimited authority to impose tariffs unilaterally, particularly the 30% tariffs on Chinese goods, 25% tariffs on certain imports from Mexico and Canada, and 10% universal tariffs on most other goods.

However, the victory for importers and businesses proved short-lived. The Trump administration immediately appealed the decision, and the Federal Circuit Court granted an emergency stay, allowing tariff collection to continue pending further legal proceedings. This legal ping-pong effect has created exactly the type of market uncertainty that makes technology procurement decisions particularly challenging for law firms.

The Technology Dilemma Facing Legal Practitioners

The smartphone and computer hardware that law firms depend on daily face significant price pressures under the current tariff regime. Industry analysts predict smartphone prices could increase by 4% in the US market due to tariff uncertainty. More dramatically, experts suggest that forcing iPhone production to move entirely to the United States could result in device prices reaching $3,500, several times the current prices. While such extreme scenarios may not materialize, the underlying message is clear: technology costs are likely to increase substantially if current trade policies persist.

For law firms, this creates a fundamental procurement dilemma. Should practices accelerate their hardware refresh cycles to avoid potential price increases? Or should they maintain their normal procurement schedules and hope that legal challenges will ultimately overturn the tariffs?

Understanding the Current Legal Landscape

lawyers struggle to balance timing of future tech purchases with the uncertainty the tariffs have created1

The Court of International Trade's ruling provides important guidance for understanding the likely trajectory of these trade policies. The judges specifically noted that tariffs designed to address drug trafficking and immigration issues fail to establish a clear connection between the emergency declared and the remedy implemented. The court emphasized that “…the collection of tariffs on lawful imports does not clearly relate to foreign efforts to arrest, seize, detain, or otherwise intercept wrongdoers within their jurisdictions".

This reasoning suggests that even if the Federal Circuit Court ultimately upholds some aspects of the administration's trade policy, the current broad-based tariff regime may face continued legal challenges. However, the court left intact Section 232 tariffs on steel, aluminum, and automobiles, indicating that more narrowly tailored trade measures may survive judicial scrutiny.

Practical Procurement Strategies for Law Firms

Given this uncertain environment, law firms should consider a hybrid approach to technology procurement that balances risk management with cost efficiency. Rather than making dramatic changes to established procurement cycles, firms should focus on strategic timing and vendor diversification.

  • Immediate Actions: Law firms with aging hardware that was already scheduled for replacement should consider accelerating those purchases slightly. Equipment approaching end-of-life status represents the highest risk category, as firms cannot afford to delay these replacements indefinitely. However, avoid panic purchasing of equipment that still has useful life remaining.

  • Vendor Diversification: The current trade tensions highlight the risks of over-reliance on any single country's manufacturing base. Samsung smartphones, for example, may face fewer tariff pressures than Apple devices because Samsung shifted most production away from China to Vietnam, India, and South Korea. Law firms should evaluate whether their technology vendors have diversified supply chains that reduce exposure to specific country-based tariffs.

  • Future-Proofing Without Overcommitment: Interestingly, recent surveys reveal that 73% of iPhone users and 87% of Samsung Galaxy users find little to no value in artificial intelligence features. This suggests that law firms should focus procurement decisions on proven functionality rather than cutting-edge features that may not provide practical value. Battery life, storage capacity, and build quality remain more important factors than AI capabilities for most legal professionals.

The Economics of Hardware as a Service

be the hero in your law office by having a solid understanding of where your tech comes from and how tariffs may impact your purchasing power!

The US Court of International Trade’s ruling and the ensuing tariff uncertainty underscore the need for law firms to reassess traditional hardware procurement models. Hardware as a Service (HaaS) offers a strategic alternative, shifting the financial and operational risks of ownership to specialized providers. Under HaaS, firms pay fixed monthly fees for enterprise-grade computers and devices, with vendors handling maintenance, upgrades, and supply chain disruptions—critical advantages amid fluctuating trade policies.

For small-to-midsize firms, HaaS mitigates two key risks: sudden tariff-driven price hikes and premature hardware obsolescence. By converting capital expenditures into predictable operational costs, firms avoid large upfront investments in equipment that may depreciate rapidly if tariffs escalate. Providers also absorb the burden of navigating geopolitical trade complexities, ensuring timely hardware replacements even if import restrictions tighten.

While many legal workflows rely on Software as a Service (SaaS), these cloud-based tools still require reliable hardware. Outdated computers struggle with modern SaaS platforms, leading to lagging performance, security vulnerabilities, and lost productivity. HaaS ensures firms maintain hardware capable of running current software efficiently, without the financial strain of cyclical refresh cycles.

Long-Term Strategic Considerations

Law firms must avoid knee-jerk reactions to tariff headlines. The legal challenges to presidential trade authority suggest broader import duties may face judicial limits, but appeals will prolong uncertainty. Instead, firms should build hardware procurement resilience through:

  1. Vendor Diversification: Partner with HaaS providers and suppliers across multiple regions to reduce dependency on tariff-affected geographies.

  2. Modular Budgeting: Allocate flexible funds for hardware upgrades, allowing adjustments as trade policies evolve.

  3. Performance Benchmarks: Prioritize devices with proven durability and processing power over speculative AI features, as 73% of legal professionals report minimal use of smartphone AI tools.

Final Thoughts

THERE ARE MORE FACTORS THAT JUST THE TARIFF’S THEMSELVES FOR LAWYER TO CONSIDER WHEN PURCHASING THEIR NEXT OFFICE TECH DEVICE!

The tariff chaos demands measured action, not paralysis. Firms should:

  • Replace aging hardware incapable of running current software and SaaS tools efficiently, as outdated devices increase security risks and hinder client service.

  • Adopt hybrid procurement models, blending HaaS for high-risk devices (e.g., laptops, servers) with outright purchases for stable, long-use equipment (e.g., monitors, keyboards, etc.).

  • Ignore speculative tech trends; focus on hardware that enhances core workflows, not flashy AI features with negligible practical value.

By anchoring decisions in operational needs rather than tariff panic, firms will balance cost efficiency with preparedness for any trade policy outcome.

MTC

🎙️ Ep. 107: AI Demand Pro Co-Founder Travis Easton on Fast, Effective Settlement Drafting!

My next guest is Travis Easton, Co-Managing Partner of Easton & Easton LLP and CEO of AI Demand Pro, Inc. We discusses how AI is transforming legal workflows. Travis outlines three benefits of AI: boosting efficiency, revenue, and work quality. He also explores real-world uses of ChatGPT and Claude for tasks like drafting emails while stressing data privacy and accuracy. Furthermore, Travis warns of pitfalls like AI hallucinations and over-reliance, underscoring that lawyers must always review and finalize AI-assisted work to ensure integrity.

All this and more!

Enjoy!

Join Travis and me as we discuss the following three questions and more!

  1. What are your top three AI strategies for enhancing daily legal tasks, and how can lawyers integrate them seamlessly?

  2. How does AI Demand Pro leverage AI to streamline legal processes more effectively than traditional methods, and what are the key benefits of this approach?

  3. What are the top three potential pitfalls or red flags that users of AI tools like AI Demand Pro should be aware of to ensure responsible and effective use?

In our conversation, we cover the following:

[00:56] Travis's Tech Setup

[06:29] AI Strategies for Enhancing Legal Tasks

[11:55] Real-Time Examples of AI Use in Legal Practice

[14:54] Potential Pitfalls of AI Tools in Legal Practice

[20:14] Ensuring Responsible and Effective AI Use

[22:33] Contact Information

Resources:

Connect with Travis:

LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/travis-easton

Website: demandpro.ai/

Email: mailto: travis@demandpro.ai

Software & Cloud Services mentioned in the conversation:

  • AI Demand Pro: https://www.demandpro.ai

  • Apple iPad: https://www.apple.com/ipad/

  • Apple iPhone: https://www.apple.com/iphone/

  • Apple Keyboard: https://www.apple.com/keyboards/

  • Apple MacBook Air: https://www.apple.com/macbook-air/

  • Apple Pencil: https://www.apple.com/apple-pencil/

  • Apple TV: https://www.apple.com/tv/

  • CasePeer CRM: https://www.casepeer.com

  • ChatGPT: https://chat.openai.com

  • Claude AI: https://claude.ai

  • DocReviewPad: https://www.litsoftware.com/docreviewpad

  • ExhibitsPad: https://www.litsoftware.com/exhibitspad

  • LIT Software Suite: https://www.litsoftware.com

  • Microsoft Word: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/word

  • TimelinePad: https://www.litsoftware.com/timelinepad

  • TranscriptPad: https://www.litsoftware.com/transcriptpad

  • TrialPad: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/trialpad-trial-presentation/id1319316401

  • WordPerfect: https://www.wordperfect.com 

Transcript

[00:00:00]

Introduction

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Episode 107. AI Demand pro. Travis Easton on fast, effective settlement drafting.

Our next guest is Travis Easton personal injury journey and co-founder of AI Demand Pro. Travis shares with us his groundbreaking insights on leveraging AI for settlement demands, essential legal tech tools and practical strategies that transform law firm efficiency. We discuss this and much more.

Enjoy.

Ad Read #1: Consider Giving The Tech-Savvy Lawyer.Page Podcast A Five-Star ⭐️ Review!

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Have you been enjoying the Tech Savvy lawyer.page podcast? Consider giving us a five star review on Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcast feeds.

Introducing Our Guest!

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Travis, welcome to the podcast.

Travis Easton: Thanks, Michael. Nice to be here. Appreciate it.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: I appreciate you being here. And to get things started, please tell us what your current tech setup is.

Our Guest's Tech Setup!

Travis Easton: Yeah, so we're a personal injury law firm here, and so [00:01:00] we've been with Case Peer, which is a CRM that we actually were one of their initial customers of, I think seven, eight years ago.

So that's what we used to kind of run our law firm, and it's been great. And then we use AI Demand Pro to write mm-hmm. Settlement. Mm-hmm. Cool. They've been awesome that, and we're gonna talk a little bit more about that since we're one of the founders of that. So a company called Alert, which helps us with, it's not really necessarily tech, but that's what brings in a lot of our leads and things like that.

Cool. So we can

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: get more cases. Well, tell us about your hardware. What kind of computers are you using today? What's on your desk there?

Travis Easton: We're Apple people.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Okay. Oh, you know Max. Excellent. Do you know what you're using? A Mac Mini. A Mac Studio. I have a, I have a

Travis Easton: MacBook Air. I just got the new MacBook Air that came out this year.

So

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Nice.

Travis Easton: We usually upgrade every couple years. Me and my brother are pretty attuned to all the new Mac products that come out every year.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Excellent. And do you have any other devices, like for instance, with your smartphone,

Travis Easton: iPhone,

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: and do you keep up to date on that?

Travis Easton: I'm a part of the yearly renewal program, [00:02:00] yes.

So, yep. Every year. Same here, A new iPhone.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Same here. It's interesting, I was at the A BA tech show recently and they talked about how only 6% of law firms use Apple computers, which seems a little bit weird to me, but other hand here I am listening to you. It's like we're an Apple computer office.

Travis Easton: Yeah, no, I think we are one of the rare ones.

I would say there's more and more that are switching over. But when we did initially make the switch over a number of years ago, the biggest thing was my dad who had started our law firm, was still on Word perfect. And so having, I don't, you know, I wasn't at the firm at that time. I think I was still in college, but having to go from word perfect to word.

That there was some transformation conversion process and it was pretty terrible. So I think that was the hardest part when they, they switched over from PCs to Max. But since then it's been great.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: I think a lot of the older attorneys, they had macros already built forward. Perfect. And they didn't wanna reinvent the wheel.

Travis Easton: Yeah.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: And so, well, I mean, I think

Travis Easton: when my dad started, it was a [00:03:00] typewriter, to be honest. So I, I know it was for sure. But I'm saying even when we started our firm and kind of went out on his own, we definitely had a typewriter in the office. So that's just, it's pretty crazy to think how far we've come.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: I tell everybody that the best class I took in high school typing.

Travis Easton: Yeah,

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: because I've gotten, be able to get so much done because I can type.

Travis Easton: Makes a huge difference. That's for sure.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Are there any other tech devices that you use that help you in your day-to-day work?

Travis Easton: Yeah. I mean, it's kind of related, but Apple TVs right? For demonstrations. Yeah. Things like that. When I'm, when I'm giving demos or have a group setting and we want to mm-hmm.

Present something that's kind of how we use it. We use an Apple TV and flash it up onto the computer. iPads are also very big as well. We're a trial attorney firm. Mm-hmm. And so we use some technology that, there's an app called Trial Pad and we've utilized that at trial and it's great with iPads and just kind of as far as your exhibits and everything you wanna present.

And so just makes your life a lot easier in that regard.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: So you know Brett Bernie, right?

Travis Easton: I don't know Brett, to be honest.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: You need to talk to Brett [00:04:00] Bernie. Who does in the news podcast with Jeff Richardson. They are all in on. That software package, and I know Brett, and someone from Lit Software came and did a presentation or two at the a BA tech show this year, so I know how well regarded that product is. Do you use an Apple pencil to help you with that or is it all,

Travis Easton: I mean, sometimes my brother, to be honest, is better with the Apple pencil.

I'm mm-hmm. I'm usually a finger type guide, but I know you can use it with that as well. But yeah, I'm usually, I'm not as adept with the Apple Pencil.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Using an Apple keyboard?

Travis Easton: I have, yeah. It depends on what, on the task I'm doing, but yeah, for things like trial padd, I'll usually throw the keyboard on there.

Cool.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: How do you like that in comparison when you're using your Mac Air versus your, your iPad?

Travis Easton: I almost always use a computer for things. You can't use the trial, at least the last time we used it a little bit ago, it was just an iPad app you couldn't do it on. Mm-hmm. I don't know if they have plans to change that at any point, but anything else I'm doing, I try to always use a computer.

I'm just more familiar with that for things like typing and stuff like that.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Well, [00:05:00] actually, let me rephrase the question a little bit. How do you like using the Mac error versus the iPad? In the sense of typing and data input

Travis Easton: I'm much quicker on the computer, on the Mac and book error. Mm-hmm. Yeah.

I'm much more familiar with that and for what I do. Mm-hmm. The things I do on a daily basis, the computer is much quicker and better.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: I tried shifting over to the iPad a little more and it's just not the same. Yeah. I want the power of a computer or I'm multitask a little bit more and I just feel a bit naked when I'm trying to use the iPad.

Travis Easton: The computer, it just works a lot better.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Yeah. Yep. Yep. Same here. Well, let's get into the questions.

Question #1:  What are Travis' top three AI strategies for enhancing day-to-day legal tasks? How can lawyers integrate them seamlessly into their workflow?

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Question number one, what are your top three AI strategies for enhancing day-to-day legal tasks? How can lawyers integrate them seamlessly into their workflow?

Travis Easton: Alright, well let's get into it. So to me, what, as I kind of thought about this and have pondered it, I think that the way that AI should be looked at and utilized in the legal field can help in kind of three ways. One, you wanna make life easier. Two, you want to see if you [00:06:00] can utilize it to increase revenue.

And three, you want to use it to improve your work product. Right? To me, as a lawyer. If you can have an AI product that can capture all three of those, or at least some of 'em. Mm-hmm. And I think it's a winner. And that's something that should definitely be looked at and explored to see how you can utilize it and put it into your practice.

So going to the first one, right? How do you make life easier? And like I mentioned earlier, we've created an a company called AI Demand Pro. Mm-hmm. That's why the main that we utilize in our practice right now that relates to ai. So I am gonna reference that from time to time throughout these things.

Absolutely. Sure. So forgive me if I kind of talk about it quite a bit, but that's my best example of how I can kind of explain these things to you. So our firm is a personal injury law firm. We've been around for 30 plus years. My dad and three brothers and I work together here. We have, I think, seven associates now that work for us.

With us and they're great. And then we have a demand writing department. And so the [00:07:00] way that our firm is made up is, you know, in a personal injury case, you sign up the client, they go and do their medical treatment, and then from there you gather all the documents, you gather the photographs, you gather all the data, and you would have your demand writing department summarize all of that and put it together in what is called the demand package.

Once that is ready, then it goes to the attorney's desk. He reviews it, edits it, makes it better, and then talks it over with the client, and then when it's ready, it goes out the door and you send that to the insurance company. And that's kind of the lifeblood of a personal injury law firm. Or at least for the majority of 'em, some just go straight to litigation.

But the majority, this is kind of the crucial first step. The insurance company responds and accepts your offer, or you enter into negotiations and you're able to, you know, resolve it and settle the case is done. If you're not able to, that's when you would then file the lawsuit and go into what we refer to as litigation, right?

What we've been able to do in our practice is create this company called AI Demand that we basically built in-house for our firm, and it takes all of those [00:08:00] components. We put it into our software, and then the AI basically writes a settlement demand. In less than 30 minutes. So it's taking what would've taken hours to days for that demand, right?

Or an attorney and turns it into a 30 minute to a couple hour process, depending on, you know, the size of the demand. And so when you have that in mind, right, when we talk about this first one, making it easier. My sister is our head demand writer and has been leading that department for the past 15 years.

It's amazing that she stuck with that job because it's a very tedious, it's a very boring job. You're literally just summarizing medical records and typing them into a computer all day, and so it was our highest turnover position at our firm. It's usually college graduates, and then they try for a little bit, and then they're like, I want to go do something else, and so it was just a tough position to keep fill.

So what has happened since we've installed this program and created this, you know, AI Demand Pro within our business is not a single [00:09:00] demand writer has left because the process is so much easier, it's so much more rewarding for the demand writers. And so it took it from them having to summarize hundreds to thousands of medical pages on each case down to now they are reviewing the output, they are reviewing the document.

They're just cross referencing, checking it. And so it just has made their life much more enjoyable. And so I think when you're looking at an AI product, whether it's for discovery, whether it's, you know, for depositions, what, there's so many different products out there, those are kind of the ones that really touch home to personal injury.

You want to look for a product that can make your life easier, right? Mm-hmm. Make it, you don't have to do as much, because I think that's one of the beautiful things of machine learning. Right?

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Well, I think one thing that you keep. Saying that I really wanna emphasize to the listeners that you do have to review your work

Travis Easton: a hundred

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: percent and make sure that you don't make any mistakes.

And you know, quite honestly in our conversation here, you've sort of just automatically bled into question number two. You know, how [00:10:00] does AI de demand pro leverage ai, streamline legal processes more effectively than traditional methods? And what are the key benefits of this approach? I think you answered that beautifully.

That being said, I'm gonna take it back a step. Yep. Going back to question number one, can you give us any examples of how you do use ai? I mean like actual real time examples in the sense of, you know, particular product to do x, Y to Z.

Travis Easton: I guess regarding your question, you know, I mean, you mean apart from like AI Demand Pro or something like that?

That,

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. I didn't know if you had any other examples or is your Bailey with AI really focused on AI demand Pro.

Travis Easton: The majority of it is I will use chat GBT or Quad if I have a specific question or if I have a specific task, I'll use it for email. Sometimes I'll use them for those things.

But the majority of our focus has been mm-hmm. Developing this and on utilizing this AI because it's so encompassing within the personal injury law firm. Right. And the other thing that, you know, we can reference this later when we talk about the pitfalls, [00:11:00] but you have to be very careful. Not only, like you said, to review your work, but before you upload any sensitive data, right, that in return have like medical records or things should not be uploading anything like that just into Chad gbt, right?

That's on the internet, right? What we've been able to do is safeguard to set up so many privacy blockades and just things like that within our site when we developed AI Demand Pro so that you can take those medical records and upload them and they're still HIPAA compliant, they're still safe ever. All of your data is double encrypted, and so for that reason, I, to be honest, I am very cautious utilizing AI for anything that.

Would, I would deem clients sensitive, or that should not just be uploaded to an nor ordinary site like chat, GBT or Claude.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Well, could you give us an example of how you might use one of those two AI to help you write an email? For what purpose might you do that?

Travis Easton: Yeah, so what I would usually do [00:12:00] is I would take the reply, the response from the person, you know?

Mm-hmm. If it's, if I'm responding to someone, I might take the response, put it in there, and then. Either put a little thing, like a little response of what I'm thinking I want it to be. Mm-hmm. Or I would give it a prompt, right? Like, Hey, I'm looking to respond in this way to this email. Could you drop to, for me, I think the, one of the best ways is that you, it just saves you so much time.

And to be honest, brain power. Right? And having to really focus in, because we only have so much brain power, we can right muster up throughout the day. And so if you can unload some of that off onto the AI model. I think it helps tremendously. And so basically you can get the gist and the tone of what you're trying to say and put it in there, and then it can spit out its first version and then you can either, you know, give it some more prompting and tweak it further from there.

Or you can just take it and then you edit it and finish it up and make sure it's the tone and the work, you know, the verbiage that you want.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: So I'm assuming that you take out any PII from the response email [00:13:00] that you get before you pop it into

Travis Easton: Yes.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Claude or chat bt. Yeah, yeah,

Travis Easton: yeah. No personal information or anything like that.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Yep.

Ad #2: Consider Buying The Tech-Savvy Lawyer a Cup of Coffee ☕️ or Two ☕️☕️!

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Pardon the interruption. I hope you're enjoying the Tech Heavy Lawyer page podcast. As much as I enjoy making them consider buying us a cup of coffee or two to help toray some of the production costs. Thanks and enjoy

and. I've received emails from a handful of parties over the years where quite honestly, , their communication may not have made sense or wasn't very clear.

And I will copy that. I will take out the p if there's any pi, I'm say, can, can you one tell me what is this person trying to convey to me? And two, draft an appropriate response. And it saves me some brain power there. 'cause sometimes. You get from certain parties, emails that really aren't clear, and that's me being polite.

Yes.

Travis Easton: A hundred percent.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Well, let's get into our last question.

Q?#3:  What are the top three potential pitfalls or red flags that users of AI tools like AI Demand Pro should be aware of to ensure responsible and effective use?

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: What are the top three potential pitfalls or red flags that users of AI tools like AI Demand Pro should be aware of to ensure responsible and effective [00:14:00] use?

Travis Easton: Yeah, so there's several. We've kind of referenced a couple of up to date. So the first one I wanted to talk about was, no AI company should be using the data that you are feeding it to learn from it.

So that should be the red flag when anybody is looking to sign up, you know, for an AI service mm-hmm. Or an AI connect. One of the questions you should be asking is, do, are you using my data to train your AI model? The biggest thing there is the privacy, right? If you know, if they are using their data. To train their AI model, and let's say they put in something about Joe fracturing his leg.

Then what happens is now that LLLM model will have that data that Joe fractured his leg actually baked into it. And so you're just giving up that privacy of that client or that person of whatever you fed into it and it's going into the system and now it's there forever. I think first thing is just make sure that no one is using your data to train their model off of first and foremost.[00:15:00]

Yeah. Did you have a question?

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Well, so like I'm looking at your website and I see, you know, there's a clear chart here that says HIPAA compliant, which I'm presuming is in part, you know, not training off of the data that you put into it. Correct. Is there anything that you can think of that the listeners should be aware of and looking for when they review a site like AI Demand Pro?

Like what key? Bits should they be seeing that says this is going to be something that is not gonna be learned from.

Travis Easton: I don't think anybody is necessarily gonna say that specific thing on the website. When you're in a demo. When you're in a conversation. Mm-hmm. Looking to use it. Or maybe the frequently asked questions.

That is when you would want to bring it up. The HIPAA compliance, of course, is, that's kind of a separate topic. That just means that your medical data is safe and secure and, and being safeguarded according to the HIPAA compliance rules. But whether they're using it, it could be unrelated to medical data, right?

And so, right. You just wanna make sure they're not utilizing your [00:16:00] data. To train their AI model. And so I would just make sure you're asking that question.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: So the reason why I asked you specifically about HIPAA was because going through your site, and I've seen others and I don't, products and companies like yourself say, Hey, we're not gonna learn from your data, or The AI we use is not gonna learn.

Travis Easton: We probably should. We should probably put that on there, but I think it's because most people don't even know to ask that,

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: which quite frankly, don't You think that kind of violates, was it model Rule one, common eight, that they'd be reasonably up to date on the technology that they use? Probably, yeah. I mean,

Travis Easton: yeah.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: I mean,

Travis Easton: they should, right? They should. But such a new frontier. I mean, if you go to any of these conferences, everything is ai. It seems like a quarter of the talks and the, the speeches are on AI or something related to it. Right. Everybody is just trying to get a grasp around it as best they can. But yeah, I think the common lawyer still is.

Very uneducated regarding these things.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: The problem is they [00:17:00] need to be better educated because the excuse of like the attorney outta the Southern District of New York of using Chachi BT to help draft his response brief without checking it. Yeah. And then, hey, the judge is like, are you sure these legit, these cases?

And he goes back and asks Chachi, BT, are these legit? Of course Chechen, he says, of course they're legit. Why would I not tell you the truth?

Travis Easton: Yeah.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: So that was one.

Travis Easton: So that, so your, your great example there brings us to hallucinations, which is what happened in that case, right? Right. And so you need to be aware of hallucinations and so going out and asking Chad, GBT, Claude, any of these things, you are at significant peril of it hallucinating.

And so when we built AI Demand Pro, we have done as much work as we possibly can to make sure that we are not hallucinating. I'm not the engineer behind it, right? When we built this, but the way I explain it to people that probably aren't the most tech-minded either, is we have built a, what I call a closed.

[00:18:00] System. Right? And so we are not going out into the internet when the medical records say, this person's gonna get a back surgery, right? And saying, Hey, WebMD, can you tell us what you know about the back surgery? And that's where people get into trouble when they go into chat GBT, and they ask it things related to legal questions.

It's going out to the internet and gathering all of that information and stuff. And sometimes it's gonna be accurate and sometimes it won't be. And sometimes it's gonna what we call a hallucinate, just make things up. That's very scary if you are an attorney, and it goes back to your earlier about always double checking the work and not double checking it with chat GBT when you get called out on it.

Right? And so our system is closed. It does not go out and find any of that information, and it only has. We have put in there, which are things like the California vehicle codes and the other state vehicle code sections and things like that, that we need it to just gather the information if it pertains to that specific case.

Right. And so I would just say you need to always be aware of hallucinations [00:19:00] and ask them, you know, does your product hallucinate and things like that, and you know, try to get an understanding of how often is it hallucinating. And so I would say that's pitfall number two that people need to watch out for a hundred percent.

Did you have any questions regarding that, Michael?

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Nope. I think he did a great job explaining that. So I'm gonna say number three.

Travis Easton: Yeah, so I would just say that, to be honest, it kind of goes back to what we talked about earlier. Avoid outsourcing your legal responsibilities to AI companies in their totality, right.

AI is meant as a tool to make it more efficient. Yeah, to make it faster and potentially cheaper. But you are the lawyer, you the listener. If you are a lawyer, you are the lawyer and you are ultimately responsible for your legal work product that you put out on behalf of your client. Whether that's legal research.

Whether that's, in this case, writing settlement demands. And so there are models out there where you send in your demand documents, the company puts it together and they put it all together [00:20:00] and then they send it back. And unfortunately, I know law firms that just rubber stamped that, right? Review it and send it out as the work product.

And in some cases it might be. Totally satisfactory, but what if they missed something? What if it was wrong? And so right. We were aware of some things like that, and ultimately that just wasn't the best model that we saw. And so that was one of the reasons why we created AI Demand Pro was just so that we're getting the demand created so quickly that we then can take that time in-house to have our demand writing department that we still have.

Right to review, edit it, right. Make it better if it needs to be. And then it still goes to the attorney who puts his finishing touches on it. Right. Right. And because I like to think that every attorney kind of has their own little style, right? Yeah. And so what we've done is we've taken the tedious and longest part of it, of really reviewing those medical records and shortened it down to 15 to 30 minutes so that you can take the time to review that, make it better, and put your finishing touches on it.

Instead of that process [00:21:00] taking hours and days, it's now going out in an hour or so. And it just make everything so much more efficient. And so I just think that with every AI product out there, they're just getting better and better, which is great and will continue to get better and better as they're fine tuned and things like that.

But we're still the lawyers. We still have the obligation to review everything, and so I would just be caution everybody before you're just rubber stamping something that AI produced. Make sure you're reviewing it and you are happy and you feel satisfactory with the work product that's put together for you.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Excellent, Travis, I really appreciate you sharing all that.

Where You Can Find Our Guest!

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Tell us where can people find you?

Travis Easton: Yeah, so our website is Demand pro.ai. And then my email isTravis@demandpro.ai. And feel free to reach out with any questions or inquiries or any, anything I can do to help.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Excellent. I'll be sure to have that in the show notes and more.

And Travis, again, I want to thank you for being a guest today.

Travis Easton: Thanks, Michael, I appreciate it. Thanks for having me.

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Thanks.

See You in Two Weeks!

Michael D.J. Eisenberg: Thank you for joining me on this episode of the Tech Savvy Lawyer Page podcast. Our [00:22:00] next episode will be posted in about two weeks. If you have any ideas about a future episode, please contact me at Michael DJ at the Tech Savvy Lawyer page.

Have a great day and happy Lauren.