Word of the Week: "Constitutional AI" for Lawyers - What It Is, Why It Matters for ABA Rules, and How Solo & Small Firms Should Use It!
/
Constitutional AI’s ‘helpful, harmless, honest’ standard is a solid starting point for lawyers evaluating AI platforms.
The term “Constitutional AI” appeared this week in a Tech Savvy Lawyer post about the MTC/PornHub breach as a cybersecurity wake‑up call for lawyers 🚨. That article used it to highlight how AI systems (like those law firms now rely on) must be built and governed by clear, ethical rules — much like a constitution — to protect client data and uphold professional duties. This week’s Word of the Week unpacks what Constitutional AI really means and explains why it matters deeply for solo, small, and mid‑size law firms.
🔍 What is Constitutional AI?
Constitutional AI is a method for training large language models so they follow a written set of high‑level principles, called a “constitution” 📜. Those principles are designed to make the AI helpful, honest, and harmless in its responses.
As Claude AI from Anthropic explains:
“Constitutional AI refers to a set of techniques developed by researchers at Anthropic to align AI systems like myself with human values and make us helpful, harmless, and honest. The key ideas behind Constitutional AI are aligning an AI’s behavior with a ‘constitution’ defined by human principles, using techniques like self‑supervision and adversarial training, developing constrained optimization techniques, and designing training data and model architecture to encode beneficial behaviors.” — Claude AI, Anthropic (July 7th, 2023).
In practice, Constitutional AI uses the model itself to critique and revise its own outputs against that constitution. For example, the model might be told: “Do not generate illegal, dangerous, or unethical content,” “Be honest about what you don’t know,” and “Protect user privacy.” It then evaluates its own answers against those rules before giving a final response.
Think of it like a junior associate who’s been given a firm’s internal ethics manual and told: “Before you send that memo, check it against these rules.” Constitutional AI does that same kind of self‑checking, but at machine speed.
🤝 How Constitutional AI Relates to Lawyers
For lawyers, Constitutional AI is important because it directly shapes how AI tools behave when handling legal work 📚. Many legal AI tools are built on models that use Constitutional AI techniques, so understanding this concept helps lawyers:
Judge whether an AI assistant is likely to hallucinate, leak sensitive info, or give ethically problematic advice.
Choose tools whose underlying AI is designed to be more transparent, less biased, and more aligned with professional norms.
Better supervise AI use in the firm, which is a core ethical duty under the ABA Model Rules.
Solo and small firms, in particular, often rely on off‑the‑shelf AI tools (like chatbots or document assistants). Knowing that a tool is built on Constitutional AI principles can give more confidence that it’s designed to avoid harmful outputs and respect confidentiality.
⚖️ Why It Matters for ABA Model Rules
For solo and small firms, asking whether an AI platform aligns with Constitutional AI’s standards is a practical first step in choosing a trustworthy tool.
The ABA’s Formal Opinion 512 on generative AI makes clear that lawyers remain responsible for all work done with AI, even if an AI tool helped draft it 📝. Constitutional AI is relevant here because it’s one way that AI developers try to build in ethical guardrails that align with lawyers' obligations.
Key connections to the Model Rules:
Rule 1.1 (Competence): Lawyers must understand the benefits and risks of the technology they use. Knowing that a tool uses Constitutional AI helps assess whether it’s reasonably reliable for tasks like research, drafting, or summarizing.
Rule 1.6 (Confidentiality): Constitutional AI models are designed to refuse to disclose sensitive information and to avoid memorizing or leaking private data. This supports the lawyer’s duty to make “reasonable efforts” to protect client confidences.
Rule 5.1 / 5.3 (Supervision): Managing partners and supervising attorneys must ensure that AI tools used by staff are consistent with ethical rules. A tool built on Constitutional AI principles is more likely to support, rather than undermine, those supervisory duties.
Rule 3.3 (Candor to the Tribunal): Constitutional AI models are trained to admit uncertainty and avoid fabricating facts or cases, which helps reduce the risk of submitting false or misleading information to a court.
In short, Constitutional AI doesn’t relieve lawyers of their ethical duties, but it can make AI tools safer and more trustworthy when used under proper supervision.
🛡️ The “Helpful, Harmless, and Honest” Principle
The three pillars of Constitutional AI — helpful, harmless, and honest — are especially relevant for lawyers:
Helpful: The AI should provide useful, relevant information that advances the client’s matter, without unnecessary or irrelevant content.
Harmless: The AI should avoid generating illegal, dangerous, or unethical content, and should respect privacy and confidentiality.
Honest: The AI should admit when it doesn’t know something, avoid fabricating facts or cases, and not misrepresent its capabilities.
For law firms, this “helpful, harmless, and honest” standard is a useful mental checklist when using AI:
Is this AI output actually helpful to the client’s case?
Could this output harm the client (e.g., by leaking confidential info or suggesting an unethical strategy)?
Is the AI being honest (e.g., not hallucinating case law or pretending to know facts it can’t know)?
If the answer to any of those questions is “no,” the AI output should not be used without significant human review and correction.
🛠️ Practical Takeaways for Law Firms
For solo, small, and mid‑size firms, here’s how to put this into practice:
Lawyers need to screen AI tools and ensure they are aligned with ABA Model Rules.
Know your tools. When evaluating a legal AI product, ask whether it’s built on a Constitutional AI–style model (e.g., Claude). That tells you it’s designed with explicit ethical constraints.
Treat AI as a supervised assistant. Never let AI make final decisions or file work without a lawyer’s review. Constitutional AI reduces risk, but it doesn’t eliminate the need for human judgment.
Train your team. Make sure everyone in the firm understands that AI outputs must be checked for accuracy, confidentiality, and ethical compliance — especially when using third‑party tools.
Update your engagement letters and policies. Disclose to clients when AI is used in their matters, and explain how the firm supervises it. This supports transparency under Rule 1.4 and Rule 1.6.
Focus on “helpful, honest, harmless.” Use Constitutional AI as a mental checklist: Is this AI being helpful to the client? Is it honest about its limits? Is it harmless (no bias, no privacy leaks)? If not, don’t rely on it.
